国产热热热精品,亚洲视频久久】日韩,三级婷婷在线久久,99人妻精品视频,精品九热人人肉肉在线,AV东京热一区二区,91po在线视频观看,久久激情宗合,青青草黄色手机视频

Global EditionASIA 中文雙語(yǔ)Fran?ais
Opinion
Home / Opinion / Opinion Line

Some countries' silence on Japan's discharge plan raises eyebrows

China Daily | Updated: 2023-07-12 07:01
Share
Share - WeChat
File photo of the Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Station. [Photo/Agencies]

In the days since the International Atomic Energy Agency released its report on the discharge of nuclear-contaminated water from the defunct Fukushima nuclear plant in Japan, much of the international community has expressed fierce opposition to the plan, but many Western countries have kept a studied silence.

After the IAEA report was released, the US State Department issued a statement "welcoming" it. Some Western media outlets pointed out how the Japanese side and the IAEA called it "treated water" instead of "nuclear-contaminated water". A BBC report even inserted a video in which a reporter participated in a "fish-eating performance" to say fish caught near Fukushima was "very safe" and there was nothing to worry about.

Some Western media outlets have tried to be "objective" or "neutral" by quoting various sources, but they deliberately avoid asking key questions, including what are the environmental hazards of the discharge plan, how independent and representative are the samples obtained by the IAEA, and is Japan's assessment of the discharge plan adequate?

Multiple studies have shown that the nuclear-contaminated water from the nuclear plant contains more than 60 radionuclides. Even Japan admits that about 70 percent of the treated nuclear-contaminated water does not meet discharge standards.

A German marine research institute said the radioactive materials will spread across most of the Pacific within 57 days. The radionuclides will be discharged continuously into the sea for 30 years or more, not only damaging the marine ecological environment but also endangering human health and life.

So why are some Western countries so "calm" about it? It is because of their own convoluted past. After all, in the 1940s and 50s, the United States conducted 67 nuclear tests in the Marshall Islands. The US also uses nuclear security as a bargaining chip to win over Japan and make it dependent on the US.

However, the attitude of Western countries cannot help but make people ask: What kind of hypocrisy and double standard makes one keep an eye on developing countries while being selectively blinded to its allies? The Japanese government should heed the just call of all parties and immediately stop the nuclear-contaminated water discharge plan.

Most Viewed in 24 Hours
Top
BACK TO THE TOP
English
Copyright 1994 - . All rights reserved. The content (including but not limited to text, photo, multimedia information, etc) published in this site belongs to China Daily Information Co (CDIC). Without written authorization from CDIC, such content shall not be republished or used in any form. Note: Browsers with 1024*768 or higher resolution are suggested for this site.
License for publishing multimedia online 0108263

Registration Number: 130349
FOLLOW US
霍城县| 夏津县| 张家川| 新营市| 城步| 景泰县| 登封市| 绥中县| 新河县| 邮箱| 郯城县| 团风县| 松潘县| 大邑县| 安塞县| 海丰县| 忻州市| 大荔县| 桑植县| 石台县| 磴口县| 深水埗区| 大埔区| 琼海市| 民权县| 德惠市| 茂名市| 陵水| 廉江市| 黄大仙区| 巴南区| 民和| 开鲁县| 尉氏县| 凌海市| 嘉禾县| 剑阁县| 建平县| 建阳市| 岑溪市| 陕西省|