国产热热热精品,亚洲视频久久】日韩,三级婷婷在线久久,99人妻精品视频,精品九热人人肉肉在线,AV东京热一区二区,91po在线视频观看,久久激情宗合,青青草黄色手机视频

Global EditionASIA 中文雙語Fran?ais
Opinion
Home / Opinion / Opinion Line

Draft on govt info disclosure too vague

China Daily | Updated: 2017-06-20 07:48
Share
Share - WeChat

Chinese Premier Li Keqiang speaks at the Central Urban Work Conference in Beijing, Dec 22, 2015.[Photo/Xinhua]

A DRAFT AMENDMENT to the 2008 regulation on government information disclosure has been issued by the State Council, China's Cabinet, to solicit public opinions. Southern Metropolis Daily commented on Monday:

It is praiseworthy that the draft does not shun questions over the increasing public calls for government information and the obligation of government organs to disclose it.

The constant disclosure "tussle" between people who want to know more about local governance and civil servants wary of divulging sensitive information has, in fact, found expression in the making and revision of relevant legal codes.

That explains why the latest draft reiterates the principle that government information disclosure should be the norm and nondisclosure exceptional. For that to have teeth, legislative revisions are needed to clarify what is eligible for disclosure and what is not.

There should be little controversy over the information subject to specially designed laws and regulations that is not to be made public under any circumstances. On the other hand, government information that risks "endangering national security, economic security, and social stability", yet can be disclosed in the appropriate circumstances, is often inaccessible.

The draft amendment is right to clarify that the disclosure, if deemed by same-level local governments as a potential threat to public security and social stability or the implementation of key financial policies, will not have to be made.

The vague wording and the lack of concrete criteria, however, may leave room for government departments not to make public information that they should. What constitutes potential security threats and the same-level governments' authority in deciding what to disclose, is not set out clearly enough to convince people that the right to withhold critical information is not being abused. Public supervision of government may be kept at bay in this way.

Making public government information is now a step that cannot be taken back. The disclosure of government information may be better decided by the top legislative body, the Standing Committee of the National People's Congress, rather than the governments themselves.

Most Viewed in 24 Hours
Top
BACK TO THE TOP
English
Copyright 1994 - . All rights reserved. The content (including but not limited to text, photo, multimedia information, etc) published in this site belongs to China Daily Information Co (CDIC). Without written authorization from CDIC, such content shall not be republished or used in any form. Note: Browsers with 1024*768 or higher resolution are suggested for this site.
License for publishing multimedia online 0108263

Registration Number: 130349
FOLLOW US
广元市| 府谷县| 杨浦区| 石首市| 布拖县| 咸宁市| 莆田市| 阜宁县| 广宁县| 汝州市| 明光市| 太仓市| 额敏县| 泸定县| 金门县| 英吉沙县| 江油市| 东台市| 尼木县| 湖州市| 连南| 菏泽市| 体育| 大足县| 赤壁市| 浮山县| 海丰县| 游戏| 英山县| 宽甸| 东阿县| 循化| 青岛市| 扎囊县| 盐城市| 汉阴县| 瓦房店市| 米易县| 辽源市| 鄢陵县| 永登县|