国产热热热精品,亚洲视频久久】日韩,三级婷婷在线久久,99人妻精品视频,精品九热人人肉肉在线,AV东京热一区二区,91po在线视频观看,久久激情宗合,青青草黄色手机视频

Global EditionASIA 中文雙語Fran?ais
Opinion
Home / Opinion / Opinion Line

Tengger case shows even big firms can't escape penalty for polluting

China Daily | Updated: 2017-08-30 07:49
Share
Share - WeChat

Birds fly over the wetland of Tengger Desert in Zhongwei, northwest China's Ningxia Hui Autonomous Region, Sept. 15, 2011.[Photo/Xinhua]

PASSING THE VERDICT in the Tengger Desert pollution case, the Intermediary People's Court of Zhongwei, Northwest China's Ningxia Hui autonomous region, said on Monday that the eight polluting enterprises should pay 569 million yuan ($86 million) for the restoration of the contaminated soil and another 6 million yuan to a public welfare fund for environmental damage. Beijing News comments:

Since the fine is the highest imposed on environmental polluters in China, it will help raise people's environmental awareness. This is the first time multiple polluters have been penalized in a single environmental case.

The verdict should also come as a warning to those polluters who believe several big enterprises are not likely to be penalized in one environmental case, because they are growth engines, big taxpayers, and often enjoy local government protection.

The Tengger Desert pollution case also shows some local governments no longer focus on GDP-centric governance; instead, they accord due priority to environmental and ecological protection. Besides, the judiciary, too, attaches importance to public interest litigation for environmental protection, which used to be difficult because of the indifference of local authorities and the difficulty in collecting evidence.

However, the seemingly heavy fine may still not be enough to cover the cost of the environmental damage in the Tengger Desert, which was used as a sedimentation basin by the eight chemical enterprises for years.

It will take a long time to cleanse the soil, and it remains doubtful whether the environment and ecology can be completely restored. Still, the court should supervise the eight enterprises to ensure they fulfill their legal liabilities throughout the soil restoration period. Plus, there should be a professional evaluation of the restoration project under effective public scrutiny.

Most Viewed in 24 Hours
Top
BACK TO THE TOP
English
Copyright 1994 - . All rights reserved. The content (including but not limited to text, photo, multimedia information, etc) published in this site belongs to China Daily Information Co (CDIC). Without written authorization from CDIC, such content shall not be republished or used in any form. Note: Browsers with 1024*768 or higher resolution are suggested for this site.
License for publishing multimedia online 0108263

Registration Number: 130349
FOLLOW US
溆浦县| 凉城县| 阳山县| 阳谷县| 全南县| 时尚| 米易县| 遂川县| 保亭| 金堂县| 交城县| 小金县| 铜鼓县| 元阳县| 高淳县| 阳朔县| 时尚| 浏阳市| 平乡县| 公安县| 莫力| 蚌埠市| 波密县| 凤城市| 阳朔县| 紫云| 华安县| 内江市| 石泉县| 福清市| 平远县| 巩留县| 富阳市| 南康市| 广南县| 台湾省| 铁岭市| 东丰县| 安达市| 蚌埠市| 元朗区|