国产热热热精品,亚洲视频久久】日韩,三级婷婷在线久久,99人妻精品视频,精品九热人人肉肉在线,AV东京热一区二区,91po在线视频观看,久久激情宗合,青青草黄色手机视频

Global EditionASIA 中文雙語Fran?ais
World
Home / World / Americas

The Financial Times Publishes A Signed Article by Ambassador Liu Xiaoming Entitled "Europe and China must unite against protectionism"

Updated: 2018-03-30 02:15
Share
Share - WeChat

On 29 March 2018, the Financial Times and its English website and Chinese website published a signed article by Ambassador Liu Xiaoming entitled "Europe and China must unite against protectionism". The full text is as follows:

The recent protectionist measures by the US administration are dangerous and risk triggering a trade war and hampering global growth. The world is at a crossroads between co-operation and confrontation. This is a critical time when the international community should be upholding the global trading system.

At the centre of this system is the World Trade Organization, which was established in 1995 by the international community in pursuit of open, fair and equitable trade following nine rounds of multilateral trade negotiation to reduce trade barriers. With 164 members that account for over 95 per cent of global trade, the WTO has become a major platform for trade issues. There has been a dramatic reduction in average tariffs applied by WTO members, and global trade in goods has quadrupled over the past 20 years. Trade has become a driving force for global growth and trade liberalisation is now an international consensus. Despite new challenges, this body is capable of reform and overhauling itself in order to cement its position as the centrepiece of the multilateral trading system. This will be key to warding off the potential disaster of trade protectionism.

Throughout the history of international trade, protectionism has been a spectre stalking the world. The Smoot-Hawley Act of 1930 was adopted to protect US businesses and jobs and to increase government revenue by raising tariffs on imported goods. It led to a wave of international retaliation and an exacerbation of the Great Depression. In 1933, US gross domestic product plunged by 45 per cent compared with 1929, and the contribution of trade to GDP dropped from 11 per cent to 6.6 per cent. History is a mirror. Last week the US government announced new protectionist measures against China, resulting in the S&P 500 losing well over $1tn in market value. The impact was also felt by the European and Asian markets. There is no need for history to repeat itself only for us to learn the straightforward lesson that there is no winner in a trade war.

China has been the powerhouse for global growth and a main contributor to an open world economy in recent years. Since becoming a WTO member in 2001, China has cut average tariffs from 15.3 per cent to 9.8 per cent, removed over 50 access restrictions on the manufacturing sector and opened about 120 sectors of the service industry to different degrees. It is now the largest trading partner of 124 countries and one of the top three markets for goods from 54 WTO members.

At the 19th Communist Party Congress, China reiterated its commitment to opening up on all fronts and building a community with a shared future for mankind. It has undergone four decades of effective reform and opening up and will continue to do so in the next 40 years. As President Xi Jinping said, “China will not close its doors to the world; we will only become more and more open.” This determination arises from China’s strong belief that openness brings progress, while seclusion leaves a country behind.

The UK and Europe have been advocates of trade liberalisation and firm supporters of the multilateral system of trade. The leaders of the UK, France and Germany have expressed their concerns over US protectionism and stressed that WTO rules should be the basis for solving trade disputes. This clearly points to shared interests for China and Europe in safeguarding the multilateral trade regime.

There is a saying in Europe that “a single tree cannot block the chilly wind”. Only if the UK, Europe and China stand shoulder to shoulder, will they be able to uphold openness and co-operation, and safeguard the international trade regime from the dangers of protectionism.

 

Most Viewed in 24 Hours
Top
BACK TO THE TOP
English
Copyright 1994 - . All rights reserved. The content (including but not limited to text, photo, multimedia information, etc) published in this site belongs to China Daily Information Co (CDIC). Without written authorization from CDIC, such content shall not be republished or used in any form. Note: Browsers with 1024*768 or higher resolution are suggested for this site.
License for publishing multimedia online 0108263

Registration Number: 130349
FOLLOW US
集安市| 家居| 双峰县| 荆门市| 土默特右旗| 奉贤区| 通辽市| 万源市| 伊金霍洛旗| 罗平县| 彭泽县| 元阳县| 鄄城县| 岳普湖县| 开封县| 永寿县| 黄山市| 蒙自县| 新巴尔虎右旗| 蓝田县| 孙吴县| 南漳县| 米林县| 吕梁市| 闽侯县| 东方市| 疏勒县| 鄂托克前旗| 南漳县| 东源县| 宣威市| 伊通| 库伦旗| 永嘉县| 确山县| 大埔县| 江孜县| 和田市| 叶城县| 荃湾区| 秦皇岛市|