国产热热热精品,亚洲视频久久】日韩,三级婷婷在线久久,99人妻精品视频,精品九热人人肉肉在线,AV东京热一区二区,91po在线视频观看,久久激情宗合,青青草黄色手机视频

Global EditionASIA 中文雙語Fran?ais
Opinion
Home / Opinion / Editorials

Questions to be answered in Hongmao liquor case

chinadaily.com.cn | Updated: 2018-04-17 21:33
Share
Share - WeChat

It is obviously not sensible for a medical professional to give a sensational title to an otherwise academic article he posted online. Especially when his article accuses the liquor of being toxic rather than having medicinal benefits as its manufacturer claims.

The county’s public security bureau is taking legal action against him claiming he has committed a criminal offense by tarnishing the liquor’s reputation. But it is still not proper for police officers from Liangcheng county in the Inner Mongolia autonomous region, where the liquor is brewed, to travel all the way to Guangzhou in South China’s Guangdong province to detain the 39-year-old anesthetist.

The liquor, which is actually a concoction of more than 60 kinds of medicinal herbs, is registered as a nonprescription medicine, but the article said its health benefits were exaggerated by the producer, and it had been punished by some drug supervision authorities for false advertising.

Therefore, what the State Administration for Market Regulation has done is right. It has required its local counterpart in the Inner Mongolia autonomous region to make the brewer of the liquor give an explanation about its misleading advertisements. The brewery is also required to publish a detailed account about the safety and effectiveness of its concoction. It also has to reveal any possible side effects that may result from drinking the liquor.

The Inner Mongolia procuratorate having reviewed the materials related to the case has ordered the Liangcheng county procuratorate to return the case to the local police for further investigation. And it has ordered the writer of the post be released in the meantime.

Even if the doctor’s article has damaged the liquor’s image, it should be a civil not a criminal case.

As for what the brewery has done with its advertisements, how could the misleading ads continue to be published both in TV and other media after being notified as violating related legal codes? Does this have anything to do with inadequate market regulation and supervision?

The relevant media and those departments responsible for checking ads should also be investigated to see if they should be held accountable for any wrongdoing.

Most Viewed in 24 Hours
Top
BACK TO THE TOP
English
Copyright 1994 - . All rights reserved. The content (including but not limited to text, photo, multimedia information, etc) published in this site belongs to China Daily Information Co (CDIC). Without written authorization from CDIC, such content shall not be republished or used in any form. Note: Browsers with 1024*768 or higher resolution are suggested for this site.
License for publishing multimedia online 0108263

Registration Number: 130349
FOLLOW US
巴东县| 景洪市| 贵定县| 营山县| 武隆县| 丽水市| 东港市| 玉树县| 潢川县| 怀宁县| 永昌县| 祁门县| 大英县| 霍州市| 垫江县| 克什克腾旗| 怀安县| 宣恩县| 蒲城县| 黄浦区| 平果县| 宁河县| 友谊县| 商河县| 兴文县| 曲水县| 张家口市| 岳池县| 岫岩| 宜兴市| 云浮市| 越西县| 玉屏| 昔阳县| 芦溪县| 镇平县| 六枝特区| 察雅县| 同仁县| 古浪县| 宜川县|