国产热热热精品,亚洲视频久久】日韩,三级婷婷在线久久,99人妻精品视频,精品九热人人肉肉在线,AV东京热一区二区,91po在线视频观看,久久激情宗合,青青草黄色手机视频

Global EditionASIA 中文雙語Fran?ais
Opinion
Home / Opinion / Opinion Line

Universities' budget rankings not an indicator of how good they are

China Daily | Updated: 2018-05-10 07:46
Share
Share - WeChat
The west gate of Peking University.[Photo/IC]

FOLLOWING THE REQUIREMENT of the Education Ministry, 75 universities directly under its administration have disclosed their budgets for this year. Beijing-based Tsinghua University tops the list with an annual budget of 26.95 billion yuan ($4.23 billion), 10 billion yuan more than Zhejiang University (15.47 billion yuan), which ranks second on the list. China Education Daily comments:

Some media outlets have commented that the universities' budgets directly reflect their education quality and research level. In fact, that is not necessarily the case. For instance, Peking University's budget ranks sixth on the list. But it remains the most difficult university to enter for high school graduates. It makes more sense to judge a university by its minimum enrollment marks in the national college entrance exam than how much it spends each year.

It is noteworthy that government funds account for an increasingly smaller share in the universities incomes, as an increasingly larger share comes from their earnings for their training and research activities.

That the authorities make it a compulsory practice for the universities to disclose their budgets is intended to enhance their transparency of how they use public money, not to provide society with an indicator of their educational and research rankings.

It is understandable that the spending and earning capacities of universities strong in science and technology are markedly higher than the universities of liberal arts. But that does not mean that the arts and humanities are less important than science and technology, or science universities more important than arts and humanities universities.

Ranking the educational capabilities of universities according to the size of their budgets is neither fair nor rational. For example, Renmin University of China in Beijing, which is a leading university for studies of philosophy, economics, law, management and politics, should not be deemed a mediocre university because its budget is only one-third that of some science and technology institutes. It has proved to be a cradle for many successful lawyers, economists, thinkers and politicians, and remains one of the most difficult universities to enter nationwide.

Thus, the media should pay more attention to how the universities spend the money rather than how big their budgets are.

Most Viewed in 24 Hours
Top
BACK TO THE TOP
English
Copyright 1994 - . All rights reserved. The content (including but not limited to text, photo, multimedia information, etc) published in this site belongs to China Daily Information Co (CDIC). Without written authorization from CDIC, such content shall not be republished or used in any form. Note: Browsers with 1024*768 or higher resolution are suggested for this site.
License for publishing multimedia online 0108263

Registration Number: 130349
FOLLOW US
汶上县| 静乐县| 温泉县| 岚皋县| 海丰县| 龙川县| 芮城县| 德江县| 平原县| 清苑县| 平武县| 乌兰浩特市| 淅川县| 西贡区| 兴国县| 兰州市| 依兰县| 忻城县| 花莲市| 高淳县| 嘉鱼县| 荃湾区| 巴林右旗| 凤翔县| 建德市| 什邡市| 嘉义县| 曲沃县| 诏安县| 郧西县| 三穗县| 叶城县| 南和县| 松江区| 开化县| 沾化县| 南雄市| 福泉市| 泾川县| 彭水| 沽源县|