国产热热热精品,亚洲视频久久】日韩,三级婷婷在线久久,99人妻精品视频,精品九热人人肉肉在线,AV东京热一区二区,91po在线视频观看,久久激情宗合,青青草黄色手机视频

Global EditionASIA 中文雙語Fran?ais
Opinion
Home / Opinion / From the Press

Moneymaking collusion of art circle exposed

China Daily | Updated: 2019-03-04 07:57
Share
Share - WeChat
[Photo/VCG]

Editor's note: Christian Silvain, a Belgian artist, has censured Ye Yongqing, a professor of oil painting at the Chongqing-based Sichuan Fine Arts Institute, for plagiarizing his works for more than 30 years. China Fine Arts Web comments in its WeChat account:

It is beyond doubt that Ye has plagiarized Silvain's works. It cannot be explained as "deep influence" as Ye claims, because he has simply copied Silvain's thoughts, originality and even techniques. Ye has brazenly robbed Silvain of both his ideas and the execution of those ideas and then publicized and sold them as his own.

Statistics show the total transaction price of Ye's auctioned works that have been so-called deeply influenced by those of Silvain over the past 30 years hit more than 100 million yuan ($14.91 million). It is ridiculous that some plagiarized works by Ye sold for 100 times more than the originals by Silvain. In many places around the world, Ye is better known than the artist who "influences him at a deep level".

Plagiarism, as Silvain said, is a moral issue. But it also reflects a worrisome orientation of the art market in China-money. Ye is only one example of artists who have been led by the nose in their pursuit of quick money and fame.

The price of artworks created by some modern artists is much higher than their true artistic value. The influx of large amounts of hot money into the market has turned more people's heads and many in the fine arts circle exhaust all means to seek quick money.

Galleries, dealers, curators, brokers and auction houses, even his employer are all pushing hands in the business. Predictably, they have all turned a blind eye to Ye's plagiarism.

Plagiarism is a breach of other people's intellectual property rights that are protected by laws. The case is a test stone for China's protection of intellectual property rights.

Most Viewed in 24 Hours
Top
BACK TO THE TOP
English
Copyright 1994 - . All rights reserved. The content (including but not limited to text, photo, multimedia information, etc) published in this site belongs to China Daily Information Co (CDIC). Without written authorization from CDIC, such content shall not be republished or used in any form. Note: Browsers with 1024*768 or higher resolution are suggested for this site.
License for publishing multimedia online 0108263

Registration Number: 130349
FOLLOW US
拉萨市| 扎赉特旗| 墨玉县| 曲阜市| 叶城县| 绥滨县| 嵊泗县| 涡阳县| 南安市| 松江区| 沁源县| 鲜城| 木里| 隆林| 谢通门县| 嫩江县| 嘉义市| 遵义县| 宜阳县| 霍州市| 玉田县| 简阳市| 文登市| 阳高县| 长武县| 屏南县| 五峰| 沁阳市| 深泽县| 道孚县| 东辽县| 岐山县| 宝应县| 会泽县| 晋城| 牟定县| 和龙市| 奉节县| 伊金霍洛旗| 思南县| 涞源县|