国产热热热精品,亚洲视频久久】日韩,三级婷婷在线久久,99人妻精品视频,精品九热人人肉肉在线,AV东京热一区二区,91po在线视频观看,久久激情宗合,青青草黄色手机视频

Global EditionASIA 中文雙語Fran?ais
Opinion
Home / Opinion / From the Press

Farewell to GDP as only performance indicator

China Daily | Updated: 2019-03-13 07:20
Share
Share - WeChat
Visitors look at a robot used to assemble various mechanical parts at an industrial expo in Beijing. [Photo/Xinhua]

THE NATIONAL BUREAU OF STATISTICS will centralize the checking and computation of the gross domestic product of provincial-level regions this year, and halt the conventional practice of ranking the regions in terms of GDP size and GDP growth rate. Beijing News comments:

The bureau unveiled a reform plan for the move in 2017, and started checking and calculating the GDP of Shaanxi, Zhejiang and Hubei provinces in 2018 as a pilot project to prepare for popularizing the practice nationwide.

Experience shows that it has not been uncommon for local governments to doctor their statistics in a bid to beautify their GDP reports to the central authority.

If the reform is carried out as planned this year, it will be the first time that the central authority has directly grasped the brass tacks of crucial economic statistics of provinces and regions, which will make the computation of their GDP more accurate and reliable for policymaking.

That the bureau will not rank the provinces according to the size and growth speed of their GDP is also significant as it shows that the central authority has switched its attention from the speed of economic growth to the quality.

Despite this, the provinces will presumably still calculate and rank their GDP themselves. The rankings not only let the provincial governments know their position and weight in China's economic map, but also serve as an important incentive for them to compete with each other.

But times have changed, as China has come to such a development phase that one-sided emphasis on the size of GDP cannot reflect the comprehensive conditions of the economy anymore.

In fact, the GDP contest among local governments, particularly at the city level, has evolved into a blind competition for statistical growth, irrespective of the environmental effects in the long run.

Thus it is necessary for the central authority to take the lead in bringing this practice to a halt. But China still lacks a system that reflects the fitness and sustainability of local economies and which can also serve as a measure with which to judge the performance of local officials.

Before that system is established, the local governments will continue to believe that the GDP figure remains an indispensable means to evaluate their performance. There will be a long way to go before the GDP rankings are consigned to the past.

Most Viewed in 24 Hours
Top
BACK TO THE TOP
English
Copyright 1994 - . All rights reserved. The content (including but not limited to text, photo, multimedia information, etc) published in this site belongs to China Daily Information Co (CDIC). Without written authorization from CDIC, such content shall not be republished or used in any form. Note: Browsers with 1024*768 or higher resolution are suggested for this site.
License for publishing multimedia online 0108263

Registration Number: 130349
FOLLOW US
木里| 松潘县| 阿图什市| 华亭县| 铁岭县| 福泉市| 蒙自县| 台江县| 克东县| 通河县| 安徽省| 永胜县| 阿拉善盟| 红河县| 蓬溪县| 崇信县| 河曲县| 琼海市| 丘北县| 清河县| 密云县| 河间市| 东莞市| 宁远县| 红安县| 武山县| 当涂县| 尤溪县| 启东市| 霍州市| 上虞市| 万源市| 曲松县| 比如县| 江永县| 无棣县| 商丘市| 哈巴河县| 黑水县| 吉安县| 玉门市|