国产热热热精品,亚洲视频久久】日韩,三级婷婷在线久久,99人妻精品视频,精品九热人人肉肉在线,AV东京热一区二区,91po在线视频观看,久久激情宗合,青青草黄色手机视频

US divided over college admissions policy

By LIA ZHU in San Francisco | CHINA DAILY | Updated: 2022-12-12 07:48
Share
Share - WeChat
Students rally outside the US Supreme Court in Washington on Oct 31 before hearings in two cases that could decide the future of affirmative action in college admissions. J. SCOTT APPLEWHITE/AP

Top court hears challenges brought against two universities

National debate in the United States on the role played by race in college admissions culminated with the Supreme Court hearing challenges against two universities.

To create a diverse student body, many colleges and universities in the US consider a student's race as a factor in their admissions process. Such race-conscious policies — known as affirmative action — have been repeatedly upheld by the nation's top court in past decades.

Educators fear a "ripple effect" if the conservative court decides that the affirmative action policy is illegal.

The baseline for permissible affirmative action programs in US higher education was established in 1978.

Citing Harvard University as the model, Justice Lewis Powell said that in evaluating applicants, race could not be the determinative factor, but the university could use race as one of the many factors, just as it uses other traits such as a special talent for music, science or athletics, and even the fact that an applicant's parents attended the university.

In 2016, the Supreme Court upheld an admissions program at the University of Texas at Austin, ruling that the university could continue to consider race as a factor.

This time, the challenges were brought against Harvard and the University of North Carolina, or UNC, with the court hearing the arguments in late October.

The new Supreme Court is the most conservative for 90 years. The six justices appointed by Republican presidents and the three appointed by Democrats appeared divided along ideological lines.

The court is likely to overturn some or all of such case precedents based on sharp and skeptical questioning from the conservative justices.

During court argument, Justice Clarence Thomas asked lawyers for the universities to define "diversity". He said, "It seems to mean everything for everyone." Justice Samuel A.Alito Jr. asked what "underrepresented minority" meant.

The justices are not expected to finalize their opinions until late June or early July. If they rule that affirmative action is unconstitutional, the number of black and Latino students would be reduced in colleges and universities nationwide, particularly at elite institutions.

1 2 3 Next   >>|

Related Stories

Top
BACK TO THE TOP
English
Copyright 1994 - . All rights reserved. The content (including but not limited to text, photo, multimedia information, etc) published in this site belongs to China Daily Information Co (CDIC). Without written authorization from CDIC, such content shall not be republished or used in any form. Note: Browsers with 1024*768 or higher resolution are suggested for this site.
License for publishing multimedia online 0108263

Registration Number: 130349
FOLLOW US
浏阳市| 清丰县| 固原市| 旬阳县| 阳春市| 鸡东县| 吉木萨尔县| 峨山| 恩施市| 交城县| 扶绥县| 左云县| 新蔡县| 吐鲁番市| 崇仁县| 周至县| 保德县| 新密市| 榆林市| 磴口县| 平江县| 昌都县| 大同市| 庆安县| 德保县| 黄陵县| 民和| 睢宁县| 光山县| 白银市| 东港市| 泰宁县| 汤阴县| 邵阳市| 夹江县| 凯里市| 陕西省| 察雅县| 盐池县| 彰化县| 竹北市|