国产热热热精品,亚洲视频久久】日韩,三级婷婷在线久久,99人妻精品视频,精品九热人人肉肉在线,AV东京热一区二区,91po在线视频观看,久久激情宗合,青青草黄色手机视频

Global EditionASIA 中文雙語(yǔ)Fran?ais
Opinion
Home / Opinion / Global Views

Quest for civilizational inclusivity

By ONG TEE KEAT | China Daily Global | Updated: 2023-09-08 07:10
Share
Share - WeChat

The Global Civilization Initiative serves as a timely awakening call for the world, notably the Global South which has long been denied much say in global governance

WANG XIAOYING/CHINA DAILY

When the world is generally divided along the geopolitical rift, perhaps what matters most is the fundamental latitude for cultural tolerance that ultimately shapes the social order of a nation and the international order across the world.

The spirit of cultural inclusivity that allows for co-existence and harmonizing of diverse cultures is the prerequisite for inter-cultural tolerance, interaction, appreciation and mutual learning at different levels dictated by the social norms and governance of the nation.

Most if not all the nations across the Global South have attained their nationhood after World War II. Yet, very few of them managed to redeem their economic sovereignty and cultural confidence concurrently alongside their state sovereignty.

While the corporate proxies of their former colonial masters continue to milk their young nations dry through systemic plundering of resources, the myth that no economic success can ever be reaped without Western democracy is made the gospel truth and shoved down the throat of these young nations.

Parallel to this, perhaps, the least attention is focused on the cultural aspect of post-independence governance. Having undergone normative condescension by the colonialists for ages, cultural confidence can hardly find a breeding space on the new sovereign soil. Neither can the state governance veer from the stereotype Western dictates of democracy, human rights and modernization, which remain alien to the major bulk of the colonized people. The trajectory of the nation building is pre-determined with no regard to local aspirations and priorities.

The emergence of a more proactive China on the world stage with the rollout of public goods, ranging from the Belt and Road Initiative 10 years ago to the successive Chinese global initiatives in recent years, has reshaped the scenario. Indeed it helps catalyze the Global South's growing disillusionment with the current international order. An evolving alternative order in the world of multi-polarity is in the making. The BRICS expansion at the just concluded 15th summit in Johannesburg, South Africa, is a clear manifestation of such collective desire for global governance reform by the developing Global South, exclusive from the conventional Western powers.

For the first time, the combined economic clout of BRICS poses a counterweight to the leading Western economies in the G7. Dominance of the US currency in the global trading settlement system is put under scrutiny amid a rising wave of dethroning the greenbacks. Yet this is far from being sufficient to define the desired global governance holistically. Noting that the West has long been taking pride of their shared values in Western democracy and human rights, one may wonder if the new alternative order will be underpinned by a different set of shared values advocated by the non-West, notably China.

However, China has proven it otherwise. Time and again, China's narratives have made it clear that the model of democracy and upholding of human rights are grounded in the respective civilizational norms and societal priorities that vary across the world. There is no single model or benchmark that fits all. The coercive imposition of the Western model on others, particularly the vulnerable developing and least developed nations, irrespective of the local social conditions, is by itself hegemonic in nature.

Under the prevailing "might-is-right" rules-based order, weaponization of democracy and human rights has been granted the carte-blanche to legitimize "regime change" by the West, albeit at the heavy price of ensuing humanitarian disasters in many instances.

On the contrary, the rollout of Global Civilization Initiative provides the world with a refreshing alternative where the wisdom of "harmony in diversity" allows co-existence, harmonizing and mutual learning of diverse cultures. In other words, an all-embracing inclusivity with constructive engagement is now an emerging choice on the horizon of global governance.

In the present global perspective dominated by the West's supremacy, non-West groupings like the "BRICS+" are no more than a constellation of states with very diverse, or even diametrically opposed political systems and values.

The Global Civilization Initiative serves as a timely awakening call for the world, notably the Global South which has long been denied much say in global governance, though with over half the global population. It dawns upon us that a new inclusive paradigm that accommodates diverse civilization is possible in the globalized world. More so in the multi-polar world.

The pluralistic world is not destined to embark on a trajectory of "clash of civilizations" as was contended by the late Samuel Huntington. The theory would only become a self-fulfilling prophecy if the global hegemon is hellbent to stoke conflicts along the religious and cultural seams.

The author is president of the Belt and Road Initiative Caucus for the Asia-Pacific and a senior fellow of the Taihe Institute, China. The author contributed this article to China Watch, a think tank powered by China Daily.

Contact the editor at editor@chinawatch.cn.

Most Viewed in 24 Hours
Top
BACK TO THE TOP
English
Copyright 1994 - . All rights reserved. The content (including but not limited to text, photo, multimedia information, etc) published in this site belongs to China Daily Information Co (CDIC). Without written authorization from CDIC, such content shall not be republished or used in any form. Note: Browsers with 1024*768 or higher resolution are suggested for this site.
License for publishing multimedia online 0108263

Registration Number: 130349
FOLLOW US
盐津县| 吴桥县| 延津县| 衡东县| 赤峰市| 会泽县| 长沙县| 灵璧县| 纳雍县| 丽水市| 蓬安县| 宁夏| 莲花县| 会宁县| 泸州市| 英超| 泗阳县| 富蕴县| 阿拉善右旗| 五寨县| 南阳市| 梁山县| 肇东市| 建瓯市| 仁化县| 梓潼县| 法库县| 北安市| 巴东县| 乳源| 柳林县| 仁化县| 富顺县| 庄浪县| 永昌县| 玛纳斯县| 龙胜| 尼勒克县| 乌兰察布市| 东宁县| 阜宁县|