国产热热热精品,亚洲视频久久】日韩,三级婷婷在线久久,99人妻精品视频,精品九热人人肉肉在线,AV东京热一区二区,91po在线视频观看,久久激情宗合,青青草黄色手机视频

Global EditionASIA 中文雙語(yǔ)Fran?ais
Opinion
Home / Opinion / Opinion Line

EU's rational response to tariff attack should be to look eastward

By Zhang Zhouxiang | China Daily | Updated: 2025-04-15 08:06
Share
Share - WeChat
Germany's Chancellor-in-waiting Friedrich Merz (center) shakes hands in Berlin on Wednesday with leaders of the Social Democratic Party and Christian Social Union Party, after reaching an agreement for a new government. [Photo/Agencies]

Incoming German chancellor Friedrich Merz has expressed concern over the protectionist trade policies of US President Donald Trump. In a revealing interview published by Handelsblatt on Saturday, Merz suggested that Trump's aggressive tariff strategies could trigger a financial crisis.

The Christian Democratic Union leader who is poised to become Germany's next chancellor in early May expressed alarm at the global economic situation, something that is both timely and warranted. Earlier this month, Trump signed two executive orders invoking "reciprocal tariffs", under which all steel and aluminum imports faced a baseline tariff of 25 percent, with an additional 20 percent for European products. In response, the European Union slapped 25 percent retaliatory tariffs on €21 billion ($23.94 billion) worth of goods from the United States. Although the EU suspended these countermeasures after Trump agreed to delay some of his tariffs, this temporary pause does little to restore confidence.

The US administration's track record is defined by unpredictability — unilateral decisions, erratic reversals, inflammatory announcements, and a tendency to weaponize uncertainty, a pattern of behavior that erodes the foundations of trust and stability the global economy relies on.

This is precisely why Merz's concern is not out of place. While the tariffs themselves are damaging, the greater danger lies in the climate of uncertainty they create. The administration's repeated threats and impulsive policy shifts hang over the global economy like a sword of Damocles, and even when partially lifted, the specter of their return lingers, casting a long shadow over markets, investment decisions, and international relations.

Merz's warning should not be Germany's alone to heed — it is a call for vigilance that must resonate throughout the EU. According to Handelsblatt, Merz is acutely aware that there will be no grace period for his government. With pressing domestic reforms on the horizon and external threats growing, his readiness to act decisively could serve as a model for European leadership.

At an informal gathering on Friday, EU finance ministers and central bank governors arrived at a consensus that Europe must pursue a dual-track strategy, combining trade defense mechanisms with diplomatic engagement. It would be wise for Europe to look eastward for solidarity, for economic opportunity, and for a shared stance against protectionism. China, like Europe, has found itself in the cross-hair of the administration's tariff crusade. By April 10, tariffs on Chinese goods imposed by the US had soared to an average of 145 percent, despite some temporary exemptions. China has responded with a 125 percent tariff increase on US products. Such extreme rates threaten to render US exports to China effectively unmarketable.

While tensions grow between both economies and the US, trade between China and the EU has not only endured but grown. Bilateral trade reached 1.3 trillion yuan ($178.06 billion) in the first quarter of the year, a 1.4 percent increase year-on-year, according to a news conference held by the Information Office of the State Council on Monday. This figure underscores the deep economic interdependence and complementarity between the two sides.

The US administration's abusive use of tariffs has, in many ways, isolated the US from the collaborative spirit of global trade. For China and Europe, two economies whose strength lies in openness and cooperation, the rational response is deeper integration and mutual support. If the global economy is split between advocates of free trade and champions of protectionist walls, it is clear which side China and Europe must stand on.

Most Viewed in 24 Hours
Top
BACK TO THE TOP
English
Copyright 1994 - . All rights reserved. The content (including but not limited to text, photo, multimedia information, etc) published in this site belongs to China Daily Information Co (CDIC). Without written authorization from CDIC, such content shall not be republished or used in any form. Note: Browsers with 1024*768 or higher resolution are suggested for this site.
License for publishing multimedia online 0108263

Registration Number: 130349
FOLLOW US
资源县| 金堂县| 静宁县| 色达县| 凤山县| 海宁市| 北票市| 喀什市| 筠连县| 义马市| 景宁| 济源市| 宁夏| 晋江市| 灵武市| 夏津县| 麟游县| 佳木斯市| 科技| 渭源县| 呼伦贝尔市| 涞水县| 莱阳市| 玛多县| 乡宁县| 万年县| 芦山县| 聂拉木县| 奉化市| 许昌市| 大埔区| 忻州市| 上高县| 罗甸县| 高陵县| 台南县| 太谷县| 五台县| 北宁市| 木兰县| 萨迦县|