国产热热热精品,亚洲视频久久】日韩,三级婷婷在线久久,99人妻精品视频,精品九热人人肉肉在线,AV东京热一区二区,91po在线视频观看,久久激情宗合,青青草黄色手机视频

Global EditionASIA 中文雙語(yǔ)Fran?ais
Opinion
Home / Opinion / Opinion Line

Jiangnan Spring probe should help plug loopholes in museum management

By LI YANG | CHINA DAILY | Updated: 2025-12-26 07:25
Share
Share - WeChat
A Ming Dynasty (1368-1644) painting "Jiangnan Spring" by Qiu Ying is donated to the Nanjing Museum by Pang's descendants.

The National Cultural Heritage Administration and the Jiangsu provincial government's decision to launch an investigation into the management and handling of donated cultural relics at the Nanjing Museum is both timely and necessary, given the controversy over how the museum deals with donated collections.

At the center of the controversy is Jiangnan Spring, a landscape painting long believed to have been done by Ming Dynasty (1368-1644) artist Qiu Ying and donated to the Nanjing Museum in the 1950s as part of a large gift from the descendants of renowned art collector Pang Laichen. It has come to light that a painting bearing the same title was recently up for auction in Beijing, understandably leading to questions about how a donated artwork from a public museum's collection can come up for auction, and whether there has been some impropriety.

Against this backdrop, it is reassuring that both the central cultural heritage authority and the Jiangsu provincial authorities have moved swiftly. The establishment of a special team dispatched to Nanjing, alongside a provincial-level investigation involving discipline inspection, supervisory, public security and cultural departments, signals that the matter is being treated with the seriousness it deserves. Such a coordinated effort also underscores the authorities' recognition that public trust in cultural institutions must be safeguarded.

Equally important is how the investigation is being conducted. It is hoped that the probe will proceed in a thorough, transparent and law-based manner. Only by clearly establishing what happened to the painting can the authorities allay public suspicions.

The Nanjing Museum has stated that Jiangnan Spring and four other paintings from the Pang family donation were deemed forgeries in the 1960s, removed from its inventory in 1997, and later allocated to a publicly owned cultural relic store, where a labeled copy was sold in 2001.Whether these procedures fully complied with regulations, whether donors or their descendants were adequately informed, and whether documentation and supervision were adequate are questions that require clear, authoritative answers. The promise by the provincial authorities to make the findings of the probe public in a timely manner is therefore particularly welcome.

Beyond resolving this specific dispute, the investigation should ensure that any loopholes or weaknesses in management and supervision are identified and systematically addressed. Lessons drawn from this case should help improve mechanisms across the country's museum system, ensuring that similar problems do not arise elsewhere. Preventing a repeat is just as important as determining responsibility.

This issue has emerged at a time when museums are enjoying unprecedented public popularity. As the central authorities emphasize the value of China's history and culture, museums have become vital spaces for public education and cultural confidence. Their credibility rests not only on the richness of their collections, but also on the integrity and professionalism of those managing them. Whether the handling of the Nanjing Museum case is fair, prompt and convincing will inevitably influence public perceptions about the public museum system.

At the most fundamental level, public museums are guardians of public assets. Donated cultural relics carry not only artistic and historical value, but also the trust and goodwill of donors and society at large. That trust must never be taken lightly. A transparent and credible investigation into the Nanjing Museum case will help reaffirm the principle that public museums exist to protect, preserve and pass on cultural heritage for the benefit of all, not allow it to slip into ambiguity or doubt.

Most Viewed in 24 Hours
Top
BACK TO THE TOP
English
Copyright 1994 - . All rights reserved. The content (including but not limited to text, photo, multimedia information, etc) published in this site belongs to China Daily Information Co (CDIC). Without written authorization from CDIC, such content shall not be republished or used in any form. Note: Browsers with 1024*768 or higher resolution are suggested for this site.
License for publishing multimedia online 0108263

Registration Number: 130349
FOLLOW US
桃江县| 固镇县| 体育| 深水埗区| 河西区| 云安县| 晋中市| 桂东县| 深泽县| 夏津县| 柞水县| 阿尔山市| 吴忠市| 凤凰县| 类乌齐县| 章丘市| 惠来县| 绥中县| 赤水市| 河西区| 翁牛特旗| 通许县| 巴南区| 峨边| 句容市| 夏津县| 定安县| 波密县| 尼勒克县| 临汾市| 浙江省| 黄浦区| 漳浦县| 怀宁县| 察雅县| 西和县| 民勤县| 吐鲁番市| 玉屏| 且末县| 瑞丽市|