国产热热热精品,亚洲视频久久】日韩,三级婷婷在线久久,99人妻精品视频,精品九热人人肉肉在线,AV东京热一区二区,91po在线视频观看,久久激情宗合,青青草黄色手机视频

Global EditionASIA 中文雙語(yǔ)Fran?ais
China
Home / China / Society

SPC issues guidance for minors' cases

Judges are required to place weight on age, cognitive ability in online disputes

By CAO YIN | China Daily | Updated: 2026-03-19 09:12
Share
Share - WeChat

China's top court has issued clearer guidance for judges handling cases involving minors' online game purchases and livestreaming tips, instructing them to carefully consider a child's age and cognitive ability when determining contract validity and strengthening protections for young internet users.

The requirement is part of a 39-article guideline released on Wednesday by the Supreme People's Court to establish a more comprehensive legal framework for civil cases involving minors.

In disputes related to online contracts, judges are required to assess a child's understanding of their actions and ability to grasp foreseeable consequences.

The goal is to determine whether a contract is appropriate for the minor's age and level of development and to establish its legal validity.

Courts are directed to support refund claims when contracts are deemed void and to assess liability for losses based on factors including the child's age, how the contract was formed and the involvement of parents or guardians.

Shan Yanwei, a lawyer from Henan province, said the guideline responds to public concerns and will strengthen protection for minors in cyberspace.

"The increase in internet use has led to more minors making high-value online transactions, resulting in numerous disputes over contract validity and refunds," she said.

While courts in major cities have cautiously handled such cases, Shan said the guideline seeks to standardize practices nationwide and ensure the principle of "best interests of the minor" is upheld.

In one instance, a Beijing court in 2025 ordered a livestreaming platform to refund 240,000 yuan ($35,000) of the 450,000 yuan spent by an adolescent boy on virtual tips, ruling that both the platform and the minor's guardians shared responsibility.

The 17-year-old student used his father's bank card to tip livestreaming hosts over the course of a year. The platform initially restricted his account after detecting unusual activity but later lifted the limit after the student impersonated his father over the phone.

Later, the father sought a full refund but the platform argued it had acted reasonably.

The court ruled that as a minor, the teenager lacked parental consent, making the transactions void. It also found the platform negligent for restoring access without proper verification and cited the teenager's deception and his parents' lack of oversight, assigning responsibility to multiple parties.

Shan said the guideline clarifies how to handle child-related disputes in the digital age and emphasizes its focus on protecting minors throughout the judicial process, from case filing to enforcement.

The guideline also calls on courts nationwide to improve the quality of social investigations and psychological support in child-related cases, making such services more standardized and regulated.

Yu Meng, a judge with the Supreme People's Court's First Civil Division, highlighted the importance of the "best interests of the minor" principle.

"It means courts should consider all circumstances and choose the approach that best protects a child's rights and well-being," she said.

"For example, in divorce cases involving parents with two children, courts should not automatically assign one child to each parent. If siblings have strong emotional bonds and rely on each other, judges should consider these factors, listen to the children's views and make decisions that support their best interests and healthy development," she added.

Top
BACK TO THE TOP
English
Copyright 1994 - . All rights reserved. The content (including but not limited to text, photo, multimedia information, etc) published in this site belongs to China Daily Information Co (CDIC). Without written authorization from CDIC, such content shall not be republished or used in any form. Note: Browsers with 1024*768 or higher resolution are suggested for this site.
License for publishing multimedia online 0108263

Registration Number: 130349
FOLLOW US
 
石景山区| 东乌珠穆沁旗| 宜春市| 若羌县| 华坪县| 临澧县| 瑞安市| 鄂尔多斯市| 吉林省| 宜良县| 赣州市| 墨玉县| 龙山县| 陵水| 普宁市| 木兰县| 通海县| 浮梁县| 临夏市| 丰城市| 黔西县| 新昌县| 丽江市| 锡林浩特市| 大邑县| 北京市| 濉溪县| 梁平县| 鄯善县| 呼玛县| 延津县| 疏附县| 壶关县| 余干县| 广州市| 左贡县| 尼勒克县| 姜堰市| 烟台市| 竹山县| 保靖县|