国产热热热精品,亚洲视频久久】日韩,三级婷婷在线久久,99人妻精品视频,精品九热人人肉肉在线,AV东京热一区二区,91po在线视频观看,久久激情宗合,青青草黄色手机视频

BIZCHINA> Review & Analysis
EU anti-dumping abuse harms both China, EU
(Xinhua)
Updated: 2009-08-17 15:21

Since late July, the European Union (EU) has launched a series of anti-dumping actions against Chinese products, covering steel wire rod, seamless steel tubes, sodium gluconate, steel cables and aluminum road wheels.

With five cases in just three weeks, such a frequent use of anti-dumping probes and punitive duties has been unprecedented. The EU's unusual move has raised wide concern, especially when the world economy is in recession due to the financial crisis.

The EU said its decisions were taken against "unfair" trade practices of some Chinese companies, but it has so far provided no convincing evidence for its allegations.

Take as an example the case of aluminum road wheels, against which the EU started an anti-dumping probe on Thursday. The prices of China's wheels exported to the EU were much higher than in its domestic market. Is it logical for any Chinese manufacturers to "dump" their products at a loss on European markets thousands of miles away?

As by definition, dumping is the act of a manufacturer exporting a product to foreign markets at a price either lower than home market prices or below production costs.

Yet, there are indeed unfair practices. That is on the EU part. The EU has refused to disclose the list of European companies which had lodged the complaints from the very beginning when it started anti-dumping probe into Chinese aluminum road wheels.

Related readings:
EU anti-dumping abuse harms both China, EU EU launches investigation of Chinese steel rope, cable
EU anti-dumping abuse harms both China, EU EU should resist protectionism temptation
EU anti-dumping abuse harms both China, EU China files WTO complaint on EU anti-dumping measures
EU anti-dumping abuse harms both China, EU China steel imports face 24% EU duties

This violates the principle of transparency under the World Trade Organization (WTO) rules and the specific regulation of the WTO anti-dumping agreement.

Such an approach is unfair to Chinese companies as it deprives them of their vital right of defense. Besides, under EU anti-dumping rules, an investigation is not to be initiated unless the complainants represent at least 25 percent of the total EU output of the products in question. Is this fair trade practice when the EU pushes aside its own rule in its anti-dumping probe against Chinese companies?

The EU has so far refused to recognize China's market economy status. Instead, it chose Turkey as a substitute country to calculate Chinese companies' cost of producing the aluminum wheels. As a result, China was accused of dumping goods to Europe at an unreasonably low price.

But the choice is arbitrary and unfair to Chinese companies as there is no real comparison between China and Turkey in terms of economic reality or development of their relevant sectors.


(For more biz stories, please visit Industries)

   Previous page 1 2 Next Page  

 

 

宜昌市| 镇江市| 沧源| 泾阳县| 忻城县| 邹城市| 武义县| 鄯善县| 手游| 全州县| 桦南县| 册亨县| 嫩江县| 华坪县| 盘山县| 竹山县| 黔南| 万州区| 大同县| 华容县| 噶尔县| 丹东市| 灌阳县| 商南县| 牡丹江市| 凤冈县| 武强县| 肥东县| 许昌市| 甘孜县| 晋江市| 巴东县| 长寿区| 宾川县| 城步| 东乡县| 九龙坡区| 广灵县| 北票市| 开封县| 黑水县|