国产热热热精品,亚洲视频久久】日韩,三级婷婷在线久久,99人妻精品视频,精品九热人人肉肉在线,AV东京热一区二区,91po在线视频观看,久久激情宗合,青青草黄色手机视频

BIZCHINA> IPR Issue
Music companies shift IPR tactics
By Wu Jiao (China Daily)
Updated: 2006-11-11 10:25

The country's first copyright infringement lawsuits against singing machine producers and sellers have been filed in Beijing No 2 Intermediate People's Court, officials with the court said on Friday.

Relatedreadings:
Music companies shift IPR tacticsKaraoke piracy crackdown stirs mounting debate
Music companies shift IPR tactics Warner sues karaoke hall for infringement
Music companies shift IPR tactics Karaoke bars may pay for music
Previously, music organizations tended to sue KTV clubs. Some analysts see the shift to suing producers and sellers of singing machines as a potential new trend to combat copyright infringement.

The Music Copyright Society of China (MCSC) sued Xiamen-based Amoi Electronics as the company's PK-DVD 680 singing machines were sold to the market containing 20 songs that had not been copyrighted by the MCSC. The society is demanding Amoi pay 49,000 yuan (US$6,100) in compensation.

Music companies shift IPR tactics
An outlet of Cashbox KTV in Shanghai. [newsphoto/file]
Music companies shift IPR tactics
The MCSC is also suing sellers of the PK-680 singing machine for compensation.

The case is still under investigation and the date of the first hearing has not been decided, said Gao Zhihai, an employee of the court.

Meanwhile, the court received a case in which Beijing-based children's music agent Kirin Kid Productions sued Changzhou-based Shinco Electronic Group Co, Ltd as its DG-900 singing machine contained copyrighted songs. Kirin Kid demanded 59,000 yuan (US$7,573) in compensation.

Wang Xuemei, market manager with Kirin Kid Productions told China Daily the two companies have already settled out of court.

Wang would not reveal the exact amount of compensation Shinco will pay.

The two cases are believed by legal experts to signal a new trend in IPR protection campaigns.

According to a judge surnamed Zhang in charge of IPR infringement cases, copyright holders used to prefer to sue KTV owners for IRP infringement.

But their lawsuits often failed as KTV owners claimed the singing machines had come with the songs preloaded, according to Zhang.

Legal experts such as Zhang expect the implementation of KTV copyright fees will ease the tension between copyright holders and music broadcasters.

The National Copyright Administration (NCA) said on Thursday that KTV club owners should pay a daily 12 yuan (US$1.5) copyright fee for each singing room. The decision came after a two-month soliciting of opinions from copyright holders, KTV goers and owners.

The fee programme will start in Beijing, Shanghai and Guangzhou before going national, according to a notice posted on the official website of the NCA.


(For more biz stories, please visit Industries)
阳朔县| 旅游| 武穴市| 从化市| 阜南县| 静乐县| 葵青区| 大足县| 临安市| 张北县| 金沙县| 桐庐县| 德令哈市| 南丹县| 九台市| 澄城县| 虎林市| 横山县| 绍兴县| 宜川县| 张家港市| 青铜峡市| 乐业县| 杭州市| 平乐县| 石柱| 赤峰市| 中牟县| 富源县| 诸暨市| 海南省| 铜川市| 兴和县| 横峰县| 盐亭县| 肃北| 肇东市| 隆安县| 平塘县| 阜康市| 景宁|