国产热热热精品,亚洲视频久久】日韩,三级婷婷在线久久,99人妻精品视频,精品九热人人肉肉在线,AV东京热一区二区,91po在线视频观看,久久激情宗合,青青草黄色手机视频

Business / View

Income inequality plan a test of will to reform

By Mark Williams (China Daily) Updated: 2012-12-13 08:23

The fact that the government acknowledges the need to do something to redress these imbalances reflects its recognition of the fact that widening inequality is not just a major social concern. It is also a threat to China's ability to maintain rapid economic growth. Widening inequality has gone hand-in-hand with rising saving because the major beneficiaries of the last few years' growth, company owners and their senior managers, tend to save more than they spend. The latest China Household Finance Survey shows that the top 5 percent of households by income saved 69 percent of their income and accounted for 62 percent of total household savings. The shift to a consumption-led growth model, which is at the heart of the 12th Five-Year Plan (2011-15), will happen only if ordinary households have more money to spend.

What might an effective plan to reduce inequality look like? At its core would be efforts to steer more of China's income toward average families.

The most effective steps would focus on boosting competition, job creation and after-tax wages. Protected parts of the economy should be opened up to the private sector. Dominant SOEs should be exposed to more competition from private competitors. The banking system and the wider financial sector should be liberalized so that smaller companies can easily access the capital they need to invest. Subsidies to large companies, in particular the provision of cheap loans, should be withdrawn to level the playing field. And the tax burden should be reduced.

These would be bold steps and not easy to implement. Indeed, they would involve wrenching changes for many protected parts of the economy, which presumably explains why the government has struggled for so long to agree on how to proceed.

But sticking with the status quo is not an option. Widening inequality has welfare costs and will undercut any effort to put the economy on a more sustainable path. In contrast, successful reform would have a transformative effect on China's prospects, setting the stage for another decade of strong economic growth.

The author is chief Asia economist at Capital Economics, a London-based independent macroeconomic research consultancy.

Previous Page 1 2 Next Page

Hot Topics

Editor's Picks
...
泰州市| 独山县| 温宿县| 延川县| 洪江市| 呼和浩特市| 太湖县| 商南县| 新昌县| 子洲县| 榆树市| 鹤山市| 黔西| 广饶县| 柞水县| 吉林省| 象州县| 藁城市| 湖口县| 水城县| 运城市| 肥西县| 花垣县| 从江县| 宣武区| 射阳县| 安阳县| 金川县| 正宁县| 观塘区| 神池县| 泉州市| 舞钢市| 醴陵市| 垫江县| 永仁县| 运城市| 丹阳市| 宁国市| 祁阳县| 常德市|