国产热热热精品,亚洲视频久久】日韩,三级婷婷在线久久,99人妻精品视频,精品九热人人肉肉在线,AV东京热一区二区,91po在线视频观看,久久激情宗合,青青草黄色手机视频

   
  home feedback about us  
   
CHINAGATE.OPINION.Education&HR    
Agriculture  
Education&HR  
Energy  
Environment  
Finance  
Legislation  
Macro economy  
Population  
Private economy  
SOEs  
Sci-Tech  
Social security  
Telecom  
Trade  
Transportation  
Rural development  
Urban development  
     
     
 
 
Education not a cheap suit


2006-03-14
China Daily

Education is a public good, not a business, says a commentary on thewww.rednet.com.cn. An excerpt follows:

When asked by a member of the 10th National Committee of the CPPCC why more and more students from poverty-stricken families cannot afford college education, the spokesperson of the Ministry of Education answered that non-compulsory education has become a market product, and students and their families should buy what they can afford.

The spokesperson even drew an analogy to explain that rich people may buy a 10,000 yuan (US$1,200) suit while some people cannot afford to buy one valued at 100 yuan.

Buying a suit is market behaviour regulated according to our capability. Yet according to his statement, schools are like shops selling educational resources. Such an explanation is truly depressing.

It is a gloomy fact that high fees for non-compulsory education are a burden for many families. Though it has been made clear that compulsory education is a public product that should be provided by the government, the above statement by the spokesperson shows that our educational authorities are treating non-compulsory education as a sheer market product.

Making education a business is actually a denial of their mission. A clothes shop has no responsibility to dress the whole population well, but educational institutions should shoulder the responsibility of cultivating talent for our nation.

Parents are trying their hardest to see that their children achieve good education, so that the children can enjoy higher living standards. This is the social value of education. If the spokesperson says people should treat education just like a suit, does that mean they should accept poverty as something hereditary that they cannot take off?

The use of the "education as clothing" analogy is the acknowledgment of educational industrialization. This goes against the goal of education reform, which seeks to reverse business and restore education as a public good.

 
 
     
  print  
     
  go to forum  
     
     
 
home feedback about us  
  Produced by m.hwdly.com.cn. All Rights Reserved
E-mail: webmaster@chinagate.com.cn
怀仁县| 新泰市| 锦州市| 玛纳斯县| 鲜城| 县级市| 界首市| 宁河县| 东莞市| 保定市| 江门市| 涞水县| 宁陵县| 富蕴县| 会昌县| 宜宾县| 报价| 长丰县| 峨眉山市| 翼城县| 浠水县| 固原市| 神池县| 集贤县| 延津县| 田东县| 家居| 陈巴尔虎旗| 阜平县| 芜湖县| 新密市| 册亨县| 疏附县| 临城县| 汤原县| 浙江省| 五河县| 泰顺县| 当涂县| 普陀区| 肇州县|