国产热热热精品,亚洲视频久久】日韩,三级婷婷在线久久,99人妻精品视频,精品九热人人肉肉在线,AV东京热一区二区,91po在线视频观看,久久激情宗合,青青草黄色手机视频

   
  home feedback about us  
   
CHINAGATE.OPINION.Social security    
Agriculture  
Education&HR  
Energy  
Environment  
Finance  
Legislation  
Macro economy  
Population  
Private economy  
SOEs  
Sci-Tech  
Social security  
Telecom  
Trade  
Transportation  
Rural development  
Urban development  
     
     
 
 
Invest in basic public services


2006-07-11
China Daily

More money should be invested in public services, says a signed article in China Economic Daily. An excerpt follows:

Professor Wu Zhongmin from the Party School of Communist Party of China Central Committee recently pointed out that, as a proportion of its gross domestic product (GDP), China's investment in its basic public services is among the lowest in the world.

More efforts should be made in the reforms in related areas including social security, compulsory education, public health and housing.

Zhou Tianyong, another professor from the Party School, compared public spending in China and the United States. In 2004, China's administrative expenditure accounted for 37.6 per cent of total fiscal expenses while the percentage for the United States was 12.5. China's proportion of investment in economic construction was 11.6 per cent while it was 5 per cent for the United States. The proportion of expenses in public services was 25 per cent for China, while it was 75 per cent in the United States.

The Chinese Government's administrative costs are rather high. This is connected with overstaffing in government departments and their high spending. High spending on administrative affairs and economic construction undoubtedly impacts on investment in public services.

Investment in public services should be the top priority of public spending. But this is not always the case.

Some government officials' concept of administrative performance is the major culprit. Many of them attach far too much importance to GDP growth. Investment in public services does not directly lead to GDP growth, so they care little for it.

It is an institutional unfairness that government input in public goods and services is low. The situation should be changed to let the majority of the people enjoy the fruits of economic development.

 
 
     
  print  
     
  go to forum  
     
     
 
home feedback about us  
  Produced by m.hwdly.com.cn. All Rights Reserved
E-mail: webmaster@chinagate.com.cn
河北区| 澄城县| 丹寨县| 紫金县| 长丰县| 门头沟区| 县级市| 阿坝县| 肇东市| 盈江县| 双城市| 天全县| 怀柔区| 九江市| 崇州市| 专栏| 新建县| 江孜县| 大港区| 克东县| 兖州市| 江川县| 图片| 河津市| 莆田市| 罗山县| 万山特区| 大化| 苏尼特右旗| 安多县| 沽源县| 鹤岗市| 仙游县| 张家港市| 台山市| 八宿县| 岗巴县| 江川县| 曲松县| 榆林市| 龙里县|