国产热热热精品,亚洲视频久久】日韩,三级婷婷在线久久,99人妻精品视频,精品九热人人肉肉在线,AV东京热一区二区,91po在线视频观看,久久激情宗合,青青草黄色手机视频

  .contact us |.about us
News > National News...
Search:
    Advertisement
Officials forced to appear in court
( 2003-07-19 09:09) (China Daily)

Shenzhen, a special economic zone in South China's Guangdong Province, issued a rule early this month to force government officials to appear in court in certain kinds of administrative cases.

The rule aims to ensure that officials can no longer avoid appearing in administrative cases without specific reasons.

Administrative litigation centres on whether or not a specific administrative act is legitimate under China's Administrative Procedure Law.

Since the enactment of the Administrative Litigation Law 13 years ago, there has been a dramatic increase in the number of administrative cases.

However, in practice, the heads of administrative bodies being sued are seldom seen in court. Only about 0.1 per cent of administrative directors who are charged have eventually appeared in court.

Considering a court appearance as humiliating and not fitting in with their official status, some leading officials of administrative bodies tend to be reluctant to appear in court or even hostile to the idea.

This may partly explain why administrative leaders seldom defend administrative litigation cases in court in person.

The frequent absence in court of administrative heads in administrative cases has not only eroded the government's credibility but also the authority of the law.

From the perspective of legal principles, as the legal representative of an administrative body, the head or director should turn up in court. However, the previous unwritten requirements were unclear and non-binding and gave those officials the very excuse they needed to appearing in as defendants. This resulted in large numbers of trials in administrative cases having to be abandoned.

Without a precise and definite legal interpretation defining the conditions under which administrative heads have to appear in court, officials could not be put under scrutiny in such cases and held accountable within a legal framework. This seriously tarnished the fairness of the law and affected the efficiency with which the law was implemented.

It is in this respect that Shenzhen's new rule is of great significance.

 
Close  
   
  Today's Top News   Top National News
   
+China's richest village: It takes brains and guts
( 2003-08-19)
+Relief for indigent college students
( 2003-08-19)
+Leaders meet Australian PM
( 2003-08-19)
+New security official promises open mind
( 2003-08-19)
+Government to rationalize auto sector
( 2003-08-19)
+Public bidding to purchase medical equipment
( 2003-08-19)
+Support urged for national organ donation
( 2003-08-19)
+Offenders get wider re-education
( 2003-08-19)
+Measures to ease emergencies
( 2003-08-19)
+Rodents hit northwest China
( 2003-08-19)
   
  Go to Another Section  
     
 
 
     
  Article Tools  
     
 
 
     
   
        .contact us |.about us
  Copyright By chinadaily.com.cn. All rights reserved  

陇西县| 屯留县| 陆良县| 水城县| 杨浦区| 阿图什市| 高要市| 高碑店市| 廉江市| 彭水| 邵武市| 鹤庆县| 永吉县| 青神县| 临城县| 新干县| 巫溪县| 乌鲁木齐县| 建湖县| 城口县| 宣化县| 江阴市| 确山县| 南川市| 札达县| 阿克陶县| 漠河县| 东乡县| 麻城市| 揭阳市| 芒康县| 区。| 盐山县| 锡林郭勒盟| 丽水市| 宝丰县| 阳信县| 茌平县| 肥城市| 政和县| 凌源市|