国产热热热精品,亚洲视频久久】日韩,三级婷婷在线久久,99人妻精品视频,精品九热人人肉肉在线,AV东京热一区二区,91po在线视频观看,久久激情宗合,青青草黄色手机视频

In the press

Updated: 2013-09-24 07:07

By Cho Wai(HK Edition)

  Print Mail Large Medium  Small

'Civil nomination' illegal

Civic Party leader Alan Leong Kah-kit, who is a big-shot lawyer by trade, said on a radio program the other day that he "cannot see" how the "civil nomination" format proposed by the Alliance for True Democracy and his party violates the Basic Law: "If you take a look at Article 45 of the Basic Law, it says very clearly that Chief Executive (CE) election candidates shall be nominated by a broadly representative nomination committee through a democratic process."

Leong's words are totally meant to mislead the public, because the Basic Law contains nothing about "civil nomination" and he was attempting to reduce the nomination committee to a rubber stamp. That is why it goes against the Basic Law and relevant decisions of the National People's Congress Standing Committee.

Zhang Xiaoming, director of the Liaison Office of the Central People's Government in the Hong Kong SAR, pointed out in a written reply to Leong earlier this month that "civil nomination" totally ignores relevant provisions of the Basic Law, adding that "legal professionals should know better than others the importance of the rule of law and never cross the line." It appears Leong has abandoned the basic code of conduct of legal professionals in order to satisfy his own political needs.

Article 45 of the Basic Law stipulates that the ultimate goal of Hong Kong's democratic development is the election of the CE and members of the Legislative Council (LegCo) by universal suffrage; and CE election candidates will be nominated by "a broadly representative nomination committee", meaning it will be an institutional nomination process instead of an individual one.

"Civil nomination", on the other hand, relies on individual voters and anyone who has collected a certain number or more of voter signatures can stand for CE election. If "civil nomination" is adopted the term "broadly representative" will be irrelevant, as the nomination committee is redundant. In that case shouldn't the Basic Law be rewritten with "civil nomination" replacing references to the nomination committee?

The author is a current affairs commentator. This is an excerpted translation of his column published in Wen Wei Po on Sept 23.

In the press

(HK Edition 09/24/2013 page1)

新兴县| 玉门市| 桐梓县| 宝丰县| 皋兰县| 安西县| 涡阳县| 东明县| 庐江县| 溧阳市| 佛学| 洛浦县| 辽宁省| 阿城市| 太保市| 来凤县| 平陆县| 永福县| 苏尼特左旗| 青浦区| 陆良县| 庆安县| 子长县| 青田县| 开远市| 锡林浩特市| 宝丰县| 京山县| 蚌埠市| 德兴市| 兰州市| 哈密市| 仪征市| 宝应县| 祁门县| 青川县| 汾西县| 轮台县| 东辽县| 新干县| 田林县|