国产热热热精品,亚洲视频久久】日韩,三级婷婷在线久久,99人妻精品视频,精品九热人人肉肉在线,AV东京热一区二区,91po在线视频观看,久久激情宗合,青青草黄色手机视频

USEUROPEAFRICAASIA 中文雙語Fran?ais
China
Home / China / Top Stories

Steel and politics make for a bad mix

By Chris Peterson | China Daily Europe | Updated: 2016-05-29 15:01

The claims and counterclaims are flying, but the issue is not as black and white as some may suggest

Look at an issue, any issue, and the truth often lies midway between two arguments. The current imbroglio involving the world steel trade is a perfect case in point.

On the one hand, you have European and United States steel producers, hit by a slumping world market for steel products; and on the other, you have China, with its vast industrial resources able to churn out steel products at highly competitive prices.

If there was a high demand for steel, China's output and that of the European steel industry could exist side by side, as it has in the past. But a slump in demand has triggered an immediate knee-jerk reaction, mainly from European and US trade unions and manufacturers, that Chinese overproduction and dumping of steel at cutthroat prices on world markets is to blame.

But it's not as clear-cut as that. What's difficult is cutting through the blizzard of data, claim and counterclaim. But key facts do emerge.

The US, known for its ability to jump behind the shield of protectionism at the earliest opportunity, has reacted by imposing a 552 percent increase in tax on some categories of imported Chinese steel products, although the items affected constitute a very low percentage of US steel imports; thus the move is more political than real.

The European Union, which has major steel industries in France, Germany, Belgium and Britain, was quick to blame Chinese overproduction, with European Commission President Jean-Claude Juncker warning of fresh trade duties on Chinese steel imports.

Steel and politics make for a bad mix

Tata Steel, the Indian conglomerate that has put much of its British operations up for sale, blames Chinese dumping for the industry's problems, as do the unions.

Britain, which is actively helping Tata find a buyer for its plants, is not keen to follow the EU hard line, warning that tougher tariffs will only push prices higher and harm other industries that rely on steel.

China has already cut production from its largely state-backed steel industry. Wuhan Iron and Steel plans to cut its employees to about 30,000.

Britain can point to success, saying a 99 percent drop in imports of rebar steel products used in the construction industry in January showed that only a mild increase in import tariffs can work.

But the data keeps on coming. China, where 3 million workers are employed in the steel industry, exported 9.98 million metric tons of steel in March, a 23 percent rise on the previous month.

It's believed that China makes up half of the world's steelmaking industry.

Here's an idea of what the Chinese government is having to wrestle with - domestic demand has slumped, so the government is having to try and help producers find overseas markets.

In Europe, when a worker loses his job or gets laid off, the countries all have social support networks that offer unemployment pay and a range of other benefits.

China, which is still developing, can't yet offer that safety net for its workers. And when you consider that millions of other jobs in the supply chain in China depend on the steel industry, things don't look so black and white.

Steel plant closures in China would have a massive social and financial impact in the regions housing the industry, especially given the sheer numbers involved.

The world has for years been urging China to open up its markets. In the last 20 years, China has done so with a dramatic effect. It makes its steel cheaply, and sells it on the open market. People buy it.

In a world of competition, he who comes up with the best price wins. Protectionism has no place in such a world.

It may be as well for European and US trade negotiators to remember the pressures that China faces, too.

The author is managing editor of China Daily European Weekly, based in London. Contact the writer at chris@mail.chinadailyuk.com

Editor's picks
Copyright 1995 - . All rights reserved. The content (including but not limited to text, photo, multimedia information, etc) published in this site belongs to China Daily Information Co (CDIC). Without written authorization from CDIC, such content shall not be republished or used in any form. Note: Browsers with 1024*768 or higher resolution are suggested for this site.
License for publishing multimedia online 0108263

Registration Number: 130349
FOLLOW US
招远市| 中方县| 金华市| 奈曼旗| 顺平县| 洛隆县| 南乐县| 博野县| 象州县| 宝山区| 泸水县| 铜陵市| 陆良县| 汪清县| 江安县| 平谷区| 莒南县| 永平县| 伊金霍洛旗| 汪清县| 老河口市| 徐水县| 南漳县| 华池县| 忻州市| 武陟县| 罗甸县| 巨鹿县| 讷河市| 太湖县| 长垣县| 宜州市| 腾冲县| 克拉玛依市| 姜堰市| 项城市| 中山市| 九龙县| 攀枝花市| 巩留县| 温泉县|