国产热热热精品,亚洲视频久久】日韩,三级婷婷在线久久,99人妻精品视频,精品九热人人肉肉在线,AV东京热一区二区,91po在线视频观看,久久激情宗合,青青草黄色手机视频

We have launched E-mail Alert service,subscribers can receive the latest catalogues free of charge

 
 
You Are Here: Home > Publications> Articles

Survival Strategies of Different Townships

2015-12-16

Zhao Shukai, Development Research Center of the State Council

As China's rural tax-for-fees reform keeps deepening, some problems of township fiscal crisis gradually emerge. If these deep-seated problems fail to be resolved properly, it will definitely dent normal operation of community-level organs of state power, or even delay the realization of the goal of building an overall well-off society. In face of the same fiscal crisis, responses of different township governments and township officials may vary. Survival strategies of township governments can be generally divided into the following categories: 1. Some take a wait-and-see attitude and this is the way of life for many townships. 2. Some take the approach of repositioning redundant officials or let the majority of personnel have holidays or holidays in disguise and both with pay. Such a survival approach is in nature a kind of township decision made on its own. 3. Some township officials take a self-rescue approach by making joint efforts to tide over difficulties. Consequently some cadres would leave the government and get engaged in production or business and they are no longer government cadres or officials. 4. Some try to get subsidy or special loans from senior county, municipality or province-level government and some attempt to get money from local people. For rural development, responsive actions by the township government in dilemma include both constructive and destructive behavior. Two decisions are infeasible under the current situation: the first is to abruptly revoke the township government and send officials home; the second is to have upper-level government render generous financial support to the township government. Therefore, giving money externally cannot substitute internal reform. While the government launches relevant public project constructions, it should strengthen systematic innovation per se.

 

For more detailed information, please refer to here.

 
龙门县| 双桥区| 彰武县| 洪泽县| 安福县| 哈尔滨市| 沂水县| 东海县| 财经| 化州市| 池州市| 顺平县| 南溪县| 宜兴市| 乌恰县| 岳阳市| 香河县| 普宁市| 高碑店市| 越西县| 乡宁县| 乐山市| 和顺县| 龙门县| 荃湾区| 屏南县| 桑日县| 康平县| 修武县| 陕西省| 农安县| 河南省| 罗平县| 西盟| 阿荣旗| 永春县| 固始县| 泸州市| 白银市| 永清县| 文水县|