国产热热热精品,亚洲视频久久】日韩,三级婷婷在线久久,99人妻精品视频,精品九热人人肉肉在线,AV东京热一区二区,91po在线视频观看,久久激情宗合,青青草黄色手机视频

We have launched E-mail Alert service,subscribers can receive the latest catalogues free of charge

 
 
You Are Here: Home > Publications> Articles

The Institutional Crux of Community-level Government

2016-01-11

By Zhao Shukai

As a modern bureaucratic body, community-level government is not adequately institutionalized. The crux for such institutional insufficiency features three facets: corporatized operation logic, campaign-based work mechanism and fragmented authority structure. To put it simply, three problems remain to be solved for community-level government: what to do, how to do, and how to make self-regulation. This paper attempts to portray these problems and features of China’s community-level government so as to identify the direction and approaches for future reform. First, as for the corporatized operation logic, in the market economic mechanism, the function of government is to provide public goods and services. Such corporatized governmental operation mechanism makes the government become deprived of capabilities to respond to public needs of community-level society.The institutional pressure resulting from the entire governmental system is marvelously intertwined with the inherent interest pursuits by local government entities, becoming fundamental drivers for government operation. Second, as for the campaign-based governmental working mechanism, it means governmental operation is mainly featured by a “campaign” manner, but these campaigns are not “social campaigns” automatically generated by forces in civil society; they are rather “governmental campaigns” forged by government through administrative forces. It is found that the work of community-level government is basically conducted through these campaigns, whereas routine work accounts for a mere low proportion. The key to the boom of these “campaigns” is strong power centralization either by the upper-level governments or by leading officials.Third, as for the fragmented government authority system, fragmentation seems to be in conflict with the campaign-based operation, but it marks exactly the critical feature for local governmental operation. By examining the practical operation of local government, we may find fragmentation has become an increasingly prominent problem. From this angle, this kind of fragmented governmental system is not a modern bureaucratic system. For China’s community-level governments, democratization and institutionalization are advancing simultaneously in theory, but the democratic foundation is not solid and institutionalization is especially young and lagging behind the times. To solve these problems of community-level governments and enable them to effectively manage and control their affairs, it is especially imperative to promote institutional building. The most significant approach is to introduce democratic participation and enable the public to enforce effective control over the government. Currently speaking, despite the surging economic modernization level, the tough process of governmental transformation has just begun.

 
 
For more detailed information, please refer to here.

 

 
化隆| 泽州县| 伽师县| 都匀市| 洪湖市| 洪洞县| 志丹县| 鹰潭市| 澎湖县| 古田县| 云林县| 南昌县| 水城县| 凌源市| 安化县| 山东| 措勤县| 上杭县| 沿河| 南靖县| 凯里市| 依兰县| 梧州市| 延庆县| 淮北市| 玉溪市| 新晃| 三明市| 龙门县| 敦煌市| 开原市| 荆州市| 韶山市| 北辰区| 彰武县| 许昌县| 织金县| 南开区| 房山区| 永吉县| 平顺县|