国产热热热精品,亚洲视频久久】日韩,三级婷婷在线久久,99人妻精品视频,精品九热人人肉肉在线,AV东京热一区二区,91po在线视频观看,久久激情宗合,青青草黄色手机视频

We have launched E-mail Alert service,subscribers can receive the latest catalogues free of charge

 
 
You Are Here: Home > Reports

A Comparative Study on Chinese and American Military Procurement Systems

2016-08-25

By Shen Hengchao, Research team on “ Policy Options and Mechanisms for Promoting Innovations in Civil-Military Integration (CMI)”, Department of Techno-Economic Research, DRC

Research Report, Special Issue, No.33, 2016 (Total No. 1508) 2016-7-11

Abstract: American military system puts forward a clear goal of Civil-Military Integration (CMI) that not only meets the requirement for military targets, but also improves the efficiency of military expenditure as well as the national technology advance. America has a scientific policy and regulatory system of military procurement, which provides guarantee for CMI with relevant regulations. It has a coordinating mechanism embracing both political and military circles, and military procurement is under the unified leadership of the Department of Defense and with the joint management by the relevant military and government departments. The American military procurement system gives first priority to the principle of “owned by the people and used by the people”. The framework of China’s military procurement system is similar to that of the U.S., but it is necessary for China to draw experience from the U.S. for improvement in terms of the formulation and implementation of relevant regulations and mechanisms. It is suggested that a comprehensive coordinating mechanism should be established between the central government and relevant departments, and military procurement should be put under the unified leadership of the Central Military Commission, with joint organization and support by the army and relevant governments departments. The goal of CMI should be made clear and policy and regulatory system should be improved; the principle of placing top priority on civil products and civil standards should be followed. In addition, market access system relating to military products should be improved, military standards should be sorted out and streamlined, and the transparency of procurement information should be enhanced.

Key words: military procurement, government procurement, a comparative study on Sino-American military procurement system

 
阜新市| 波密县| 牡丹江市| 太原市| 宝兴县| 泗阳县| 和硕县| 来凤县| 澜沧| 台山市| 长兴县| 和田市| 云梦县| 彰化市| 浦城县| 南木林县| 宣恩县| 沿河| 鹤山市| 于田县| 额济纳旗| 威远县| 伊宁县| 海林市| 柘城县| 皮山县| 灵丘县| 姜堰市| 沅江市| 夹江县| 鹤庆县| 玛多县| 承德县| 阿城市| 禹州市| 昭平县| 旺苍县| 遵义县| 易门县| 宝鸡市| 盐源县|