国产热热热精品,亚洲视频久久】日韩,三级婷婷在线久久,99人妻精品视频,精品九热人人肉肉在线,AV东京热一区二区,91po在线视频观看,久久激情宗合,青青草黄色手机视频

China / Top Stories

Illegally obtained evidence defined

By Zhang Yi (China Daily) Updated: 2017-06-28 07:30

The Supreme People's Court has announced a new regulation taking effect on the exclusion of illegally obtained evidence in criminal cases, banning confessions made under torture or duress.

The regulation, which took effect on Tuesday, specifies the conditions under which evidence must be excluded in court trials to prevent wrongful convictions and safeguard human rights.

Under the regulation, it is illegal for police or prosecutors to extort confessions through torture, threat or subterfuge. Forced self-incrimination is also prohibited.

Confessions, witness testimonies and victim depositions obtained by force may no longer be accepted as evidence.

Jointly issued by the Supreme People's Court, the Supreme People' s Procuratorate, the Ministry of Public Security and other departments, the regulation is regarded as major progress in the criminal procedure system in China.

Dai Changlin, a member of the adjudication committee of the Supreme People' s Court, said evidence is crucially important to the administration of justice.

"In recent years, mistakes were made in adopting evidence in court trials that led to wrongful conviction and execution of defendants. The mistakes were the result of accepting self-incrimination under torture or duress," he added.

Compared with previous versions issued in 2010 and 2012, the new regulation specifies the standards of illegally obtained evidence and makes clear the procedures for excluding such evidence, and this is expected to ensure that the evidence is collected, examined and employed in accordance with laws, Dai said.

In addition, criminal suspects and their lawyers are allowed to apply for illegal evidence to be ruled out during the investigation, the regulation said.

Prosecutors are required to ask suspects in major cases and examine whether they have been forced to confessor confronted illegal evidence collection before the conclusion of investigation, the document said.

Chen Ruihua, a law professor at Peking University, said, compared with previous versions, the regulation grants the prosecutors more power to exclude illegally obtained evidence.

The regulation requires prosecuting departments to accept the application from defendants and their lawyers to exclude illegally obtained evidence and requires that prosecutors not use the evidence when they issue arrest warrants, Chen said.

Xinhua contributed to this story.

zhang_yi@chinadaily.com.cn

Highlights
Hot Topics

...
丹阳市| 花莲县| 白河县| 晋中市| 花莲市| 从江县| 潍坊市| 丰镇市| 汉中市| 广丰县| 彩票| 拉萨市| 新泰市| 屯门区| 文登市| 文水县| 保康县| 定边县| 怀宁县| 巴塘县| 吕梁市| 咸宁市| 玉树县| 涟水县| 丰顺县| 曲麻莱县| 兴国县| 炉霍县| 曲周县| 铜鼓县| 大悟县| 平武县| 新竹市| 杭锦旗| 邳州市| 瑞金市| 上高县| 夏津县| 沅江市| 喜德县| 通海县|