国产热热热精品,亚洲视频久久】日韩,三级婷婷在线久久,99人妻精品视频,精品九热人人肉肉在线,AV东京热一区二区,91po在线视频观看,久久激情宗合,青青草黄色手机视频

OPINION> Commentary
Merit should be basis for awards
(China Daily)
Updated: 2009-01-09 07:39

Allowances should be awarded to intellectuals according to their contributions and not their academic titles, says an article in Science and Technology Daily. An excerpt follows:

It is reported the Shenzhen municipal government has laid out different preferential policies to attract talents at different levels, offering them different conditions in housing, children's education, medical care and research subsidies. An academician could get a 2-million-yuan subsidy if he or she transfers residence and workplace to the coastal city.

Such a move by the municipal government is understandable. After all, it should be a kind of social progress if government money is invested in the cultivation of badly needed talents. It is also a disgrace to a society if most of its top-ranking academicians live a miserable material life.

However, for our academicians who already enjoy admirable titles and handsome incomes, what they need most is a good environment for scientific research apart from the 2-million-yuan housing subsidy. An in-depth study should be conducted on what our intellectuals really need most before any move is taken.

Also, an academic title only represents one's past achievement, and it does not inevitably point to his or her future contribution to society. We have some intellectuals around us who are mainly devoted to acquiring top-level academic titles but not intent on time-consuming research. The real value of scientists does not lie in their past titles, but in their ability to continue innovation and contribute to society.

(China Daily 01/09/2009 page8)

丰原市| 吴川市| 游戏| 综艺| 通江县| 威海市| 玉田县| 河池市| 建德市| 洛隆县| 昌乐县| 甘肃省| 丰城市| 香格里拉县| 会宁县| 姜堰市| 盈江县| 苏尼特右旗| 达州市| 清河县| 九江市| 望谟县| 西乌珠穆沁旗| 达日县| 池州市| 阳春市| 新竹县| 高淳县| 秭归县| 广安市| 吐鲁番市| 海林市| 南乐县| 凤山县| 富源县| 泾川县| 图片| 西青区| 秦皇岛市| 德化县| 昌邑市|