国产热热热精品,亚洲视频久久】日韩,三级婷婷在线久久,99人妻精品视频,精品九热人人肉肉在线,AV东京热一区二区,91po在线视频观看,久久激情宗合,青青草黄色手机视频

Opinion / Op-Ed Contributors

Debate: Individual income

(China Daily) Updated: 2011-05-16 08:03

Li Daokui

Taxes should be used for social reform

The present individual income tax system is coarse and costly. Its social costs far outweigh its gains.

The entire welfare system of China's planned economy has gone. The country has not established a new welfare system to cover all its citizens. Although the Chinese government has made great efforts to improve people's livelihoods, many of the measures it has taken have been temporary. And taxpayers have not derived the benefits that they deserve from the tax they have been paying.

It is therefore natural for many people to be reluctant to pay taxes. Taxes, especially the individual income tax, should be imposed more carefully, because a heavy income tax burden on people could undermine social harmony.

Another big problem for the individual income tax is its design. In most other countries, individual income tax is levied on taxpayers' total income, including capital gains, not only people's salaries. To do that, the government has to carry out a thorough and systematic individual income tax reform and introduce brand-new ideas.

But it has been careful not to introduce a Western-style high progressive individual income tax system, for that is not suited to Chinese conditions given the comparatively low personal income of people in the country. Instead, the government should simplify the tax brackets and tax rates, and use a relatively flat, low rate for individuals - for example, it could charge a maximum of 20 percent tax.

It is important that the government promotes taxpaying culture as a way of social and economic reform, rather than collecting taxes just to increase its revenue. Actually, the total revenue from individual income tax, which was 483.7 billion yuan last year, accounts for only 6 percent of the government revenue. Thus the huge amount the government spends just to collect such a small percentage of its revenue is not worthwhile.

Besides, income from all sources should be subject to taxation, including salaries, capital dividends (rents, appreciations in assets), and other gains. But the government has to consider individual's family burdens when imposing personal income tax, so that people with greater liabilities and expenses pay less.

Also, tax rates should be made as simple as possible. One of the lessons China should learn from developed countries like the United States is not to revise individual income tax regulations frequently just to temporarily encourage or punish people for certain economic activities, because that can increase taxes for people.

China should learn from other countries' experiences, such as Russia and Singapore, too, and link tax revenue to social welfare and keep individual tax regulations simple and low to win public support, which will eventually lead to increase in revenue.

The current discussion on the issue in China has deviated from the right path. We have been paying too much attention to the individual income tax threshold when we should be thinking about how to use taxation to build a harmonious society.

The author is a professor of economics at Tsinghua University.

(China Daily 05/16/2011 page9)

Previous Page 1 2 3 Next Page

New type of urbanization is in the details
...
教育| 昔阳县| 荃湾区| 宝鸡市| 湘潭县| 滦南县| 佛山市| 巴彦淖尔市| 定襄县| 南华县| 漳浦县| 伊吾县| 晋江市| 日喀则市| 淮北市| 米林县| 佳木斯市| 长宁县| 静乐县| 淮滨县| 通江县| 成安县| 大洼县| 荣成市| 新兴县| 子长县| 曲阳县| 孙吴县| 山东省| 阳山县| 周至县| 陇西县| 康保县| 准格尔旗| 会昌县| 舞阳县| 宣恩县| 遵义市| 丹凤县| 周至县| 会东县|