国产热热热精品,亚洲视频久久】日韩,三级婷婷在线久久,99人妻精品视频,精品九热人人肉肉在线,AV东京热一区二区,91po在线视频观看,久久激情宗合,青青草黄色手机视频

USEUROPEAFRICAASIA 中文雙語(yǔ)Fran?ais
Opinion
Home / Opinion / From the Press

Prohibiting taxi drivers from driving out of town is unreasonable

chinadaily.com.cn | Updated: 2013-01-29 22:18

Local authorities should not solve livelihood problems at the expense of taxi drivers' legal rights, according to an article in Beijing Youth Daily. Excerpts:

As Spring Festival approaches, Guangzhou and Zhenjiang governments have launched a new policy to alleviate the taxi shortage in their cities during Spring Festival.

Local authorities may have good intentions, but the method they have adopted is too arbitrary and unreasonable. In Guangzhou and Zhenjiang, taxi drivers sign leasing contracts with taxi companies and pay them rental fees monthly. Within the leasing period, taxi drivers have the right to operate independently. Such contracts are protected by law.

But local authorities arbitrarily intervene in taxi drivers' operations through administrative means. Guangzhou authorities have stipulated that if taxi drivers take taxes out of town, their contracts with the taxi companies will be terminated.

Local authorities intervene in taxi drivers' operations through administrative means that have no legal basis. This is an example of how administrative power tramples citizens' legal rights arbitrarily. The new policy that seems benefits local citizens is actually at the cost of violating taxi drivers' rights.

There are many other ways to ease the taxi shortage in local cities without trampling the rights of taxi drivers who come from other areas, such as providing free bus transportation during Spring Festival and encouraging citizens to use public transportation. Or the authorities could pay the rental fee during Spring Festival for taxi drivers, in order to encourage drivers from other areas to stay in the cities during the holiday. Whatever method local authorities adopt, it should not be at the cost of taxi drivers' legal rights. Administrative power should not go against the law, otherwise it will face criticism similar to the backlash that Guangzhou and Zhenjiang authorities have experienced.

Most Viewed in 24 Hours
Copyright 1995 - . All rights reserved. The content (including but not limited to text, photo, multimedia information, etc) published in this site belongs to China Daily Information Co (CDIC). Without written authorization from CDIC, such content shall not be republished or used in any form. Note: Browsers with 1024*768 or higher resolution are suggested for this site.
License for publishing multimedia online 0108263

Registration Number: 130349
FOLLOW US
历史| 中宁县| 昌宁县| 习水县| 田林县| 嫩江县| 玛多县| 永修县| 定结县| 永泰县| 彝良县| 含山县| 东兴市| 康平县| 英山县| 吴桥县| 商水县| 咸阳市| 新余市| 新田县| 博野县| 连云港市| 扎囊县| 伊金霍洛旗| 奇台县| 法库县| 灵璧县| 柘荣县| 西华县| 云阳县| 紫云| 土默特右旗| 佛冈县| 岳普湖县| 晋州市| 太谷县| 宁阳县| 台山市| 鹤山市| 许昌市| 莒南县|