国产热热热精品,亚洲视频久久】日韩,三级婷婷在线久久,99人妻精品视频,精品九热人人肉肉在线,AV东京热一区二区,91po在线视频观看,久久激情宗合,青青草黄色手机视频

Opinion / Op-Ed Contributors

Solar wars threaten climate fight

By Martin Khor (China Daily) Updated: 2013-06-06 08:19

The expansion of the solar panel industry in China has played a crucial role in pushing prices down, making solar energy more competitive and driving its explosive growth.

Yes, China subsidises and promotes its solar industry. But the US and Europe also provide massive subsidies and support to many of their industries, including the clean and renewable energy industry. The US provides its solar companies with loan guarantees, research grants and tax deductions that include investment tax credits and accelerated value depreciation. And EU countries grant subsidies to consumers using solar energy and give incentives to producers through the feed-in tariff scheme, under which solar energy providers are paid prices higher than what is charged to electricity consumers with the difference being met by governments.

Without the subsidies, the solar industry would not have grown. Trade protectionist measures taken by one country against another, or by all countries against each other, would be a recipe for disaster - for trade, the solar industry and the environment.

Jeremy Leggett, chairman of Solarcentury and well-known solar energy advocate, uses the following analogy to illustrate the trade war: "A planet faces an asteroid strike. Its inhabitants manufacture rockets with which to head off the threat. But, as the rock nears, they descend into international bickering over who pockets what from rocket-making."

No one wins in this trade war given the global solar supply chain, explains Leggett. Solar ingots, the upstream feedstock, are mostly made in Europe and the US. The midstream products, cells and modules, are mostly made in China. If China is hit on the mid-stream products it exports, it could retaliate with tariffs on the upstream products it imports. "Downstream, the many companies installing solar at scale can only watch in horror. Everybody loses," Leggett says.

For example, in Europe, the tariffs against China would wipe out thousands of jobs, because most are not in manufacturing but in companies that install the modules, regardless of where they are made. The solution, Leggett adds, is for the leaders of the few countries where most of the solar panels are manufactured to make a deal that coordinates the subsidies required at the different stages of the solar chain, and which is necessary for the few years that some countries need to bring the price of solar energy to parity with that of conventional energy.

Leggett makes an apt conclusion: "The world will have to embrace common security on a bigger scale. Engaging in international competition while clinging to the illusion that markets always work will never solve our common problems of energy insecurity, poor air quality and resource depletion, never mind development. We will keep on maiming industries that can save us."

The author is executive director of South Centre, a think tank of developing countries, based in Geneva.

Previous Page 1 2 Next Page

New type of urbanization is in the details
...
乌拉特后旗| 连城县| 德州市| 类乌齐县| 武宣县| 綦江县| 武夷山市| 民和| 沂南县| 徐汇区| 平罗县| 焦作市| 滦平县| 沈丘县| 新河县| 新兴县| 廊坊市| 娄底市| 科技| 防城港市| 顺平县| 竹溪县| 长阳| 丹阳市| 金阳县| 大余县| 元阳县| 汪清县| 濮阳县| 海兴县| 花垣县| 华池县| 伊金霍洛旗| 信宜市| 晋宁县| 大名县| 牡丹江市| 新丰县| 南召县| 南木林县| 潮安县|