国产热热热精品,亚洲视频久久】日韩,三级婷婷在线久久,99人妻精品视频,精品九热人人肉肉在线,AV东京热一区二区,91po在线视频观看,久久激情宗合,青青草黄色手机视频

USEUROPEAFRICAASIA 中文雙語Fran?ais
Opinion
Home / Opinion / Editorials

Anti-monopoly efforts

China Daily | Updated: 2013-08-26 09:40

China is ramping up anti-monopoly law enforcement, a move that serves the country's pursuit of building a rule- and competition-based market economy.

Early this month, anti-trust regulators fined six dairy firms, mostly foreign, for alleged illegal pursuit of higher market shares through "vertical monopoly".

Vertical monopoly refers to behavior of a company that controls its production and distribution channels to forbid price cuts and prevent competition in the market.

Before that, global healthcare giant Johnson & Johnson was fined for minimum-price setting for surgical instrument sales.

While speculation has arisen that the country is making use of anti-trust moves to prevent foreign companies from expanding their foothold in the world's largest consumer market, regulators have announced their intention to target the petroleum, telecommunications, banking and auto sectors, which may concern mostly domestic enterprises.

And in previous investigations of industries such as publishing, insurance, liquor and gold jewelry, private, State-owned as well as foreign enterprises have been fined for violations of the anti-trust law. There is no evidence that foreign companies alone are been targeted in the investigations.

China's anti-monopoly investigations aim to prevent enterprises with a leading market position from abusing their position and having an adverse effect on the building of a competition-based market economy and harming the interests of consumers.

As China's market economy matures, such investigations could become routine, and market players, whether domestic or foreign, should make thorough assessments of whether their operations violate the country's anti-monopoly law before they start to implement competition strategies.

While such assessments might not have been necessary in the past, today they cannot be ignored.

Given China's short history of enforcing its anti-trust law - the anti-monopoly law was promulgated only four years ago and it was not until 2011 that the government established the anti-trust bureau - some foreign enterprises' concerns about, and distrust of, the country's anti-trust investigations are understandable.

Regulators, as they push their anti-trust drive, should strengthen information disclosure to alleviate such concerns. They need to clarify to the market what is behind their anti-monopoly moves and how they decide whether an enterprise is monopolizing the market or not.

Most Viewed in 24 Hours
Copyright 1995 - . All rights reserved. The content (including but not limited to text, photo, multimedia information, etc) published in this site belongs to China Daily Information Co (CDIC). Without written authorization from CDIC, such content shall not be republished or used in any form. Note: Browsers with 1024*768 or higher resolution are suggested for this site.
License for publishing multimedia online 0108263

Registration Number: 130349
FOLLOW US
阿坝县| 广灵县| 米林县| 罗定市| 濉溪县| 民和| 南溪县| 郯城县| 平陆县| 瓮安县| 英山县| 九台市| 民丰县| 九龙坡区| 巫山县| 武陟县| 将乐县| 五家渠市| 巩留县| 公安县| 右玉县| 乃东县| 景德镇市| 榆树市| 新营市| 罗山县| 抚顺县| 喀什市| 嘉鱼县| 石嘴山市| 胶州市| 酒泉市| 宝山区| 永靖县| 侯马市| 新蔡县| 株洲县| 新化县| 长沙县| 沈丘县| 南乐县|