国产热热热精品,亚洲视频久久】日韩,三级婷婷在线久久,99人妻精品视频,精品九热人人肉肉在线,AV东京热一区二区,91po在线视频观看,久久激情宗合,青青草黄色手机视频

Opinion / Op-Ed Contributors

Real story of Renminbi: convenient scapegoat, not culprit

By Dan Steinbock (China Daily) Updated: 2016-06-07 07:46

Real story of Renminbi: convenient scapegoat, not culprit
LI FENG/CHINA DAILY

The exchange rate was about 6.05 Chinese Yuan (CNY) to the dollar in January 2014. As the US Federal Reserve ended its quantitative easing and began to prepare for rate hikes, the dollar began to rise. In August 2015, it was around 6.21 CNY to the dollar and, after the subsequent renminbi devaluation, 6.36.

But after late March, the renminbi began appreciating. Moreover, after the Chinese New Year, the exchange rate has largely correlated with the US Dollar Index, which measures the value of the dollar relative to a basket of foreign currencies.

The correlation is not a surprise. The basket of the US Dollar Index currencies accounts for some 70 percent of the weights in the Renminbi Index launched in December 2015. As the renminbi is now managed via a basket of currencies, China is not unilaterally driving the renminbi weaker-despite US election rhetoric.

Today, the exchange rate is about 6.57 CNY to the dollar. After hosting the G20 Summit, the renminbi will officially join the International Monetary Fund's international currency basket in early October. It is thus very much in Chinese interests to keep the renminbi stable.

From fall 2014 to spring 2015, the US dollar strengthened significantly, as evidenced by the US Dollar Index. In spring 2016, it declined somewhat.

In January, the Fed tempered rate hike expectations citing "global risks." In late February, the G20 countries agreed to move away from relying too heavily on zero-bound interest rate policies to support growth. After these two measures, the markets began to improve significantly.

However, rate hike speculation has returned in the past few weeks. As a result, economic uncertainty is increasing and market volatility climbing. However, that is not driven by the renminbi, but uneasy labor markets in the US, rising global uncertainty and the Fed's accompanying ambivalence.

If the Fed increases interest rates prematurely, the collateral damage will not be just domestic but global. In this scenario, the renminbi is not the appropriate culprit but a convenient scapegoat.

The author is the founder of Difference Group and has served as research director at the India, China and America Institute (USA) and visiting fellow at the Shanghai Institutes for International Studies (China) and the EU Centre (Singapore).

Previous Page 1 2 Next Page

...
榆社县| 当涂县| 新竹市| 田阳县| 铜山县| 嘉义市| 汝阳县| 星座| 南阳市| 巴马| 招远市| 军事| 泗水县| 庆城县| 合肥市| 安宁市| 襄汾县| 海阳市| 梧州市| 客服| 佛山市| 健康| 泗阳县| 南漳县| 新龙县| 麦盖提县| 莒南县| 郁南县| 安岳县| 镇巴县| 武乡县| 东台市| 广东省| 昂仁县| 玛曲县| 辽阳县| 长岛县| 万年县| 深圳市| 彭阳县| 遵化市|