国产热热热精品,亚洲视频久久】日韩,三级婷婷在线久久,99人妻精品视频,精品九热人人肉肉在线,AV东京热一区二区,91po在线视频观看,久久激情宗合,青青草黄色手机视频

USEUROPEAFRICAASIA 中文雙語Fran?ais
Opinion
Home / Opinion / Editorials

TPP shows its true colors

By Zhang Xiaogang | China Daily | Updated: 2016-11-30 07:22

TPP shows its true colors

Trade ministers of the United States and 11 other Pacific Rim countries attend a press conference after negotiating the Trans-Pacific Partnership (TPP) trade agreement in Atlanta, the United States, on Oct. 5, 2015. [Photo/Xinhua]

Some media have reported the possible shelving of the Trans-Pacific Partnership Agreement (a would-be 12-nation trade deal with rules written by the United States and excluding China), as a result of the United States withdrawing from it, would be a setback for globalization.

This is ironic, since in its true colors, the TPP is not a trade deal, but rather a geopolitical instrument, albeit a poor one.

It is not designed to be open and to accommodate all trading nations on an equal footing. Instead, it is intended to reinforce the US' dominant position by accommodating some nations handpicked by it and deliberately excluding others, no matter how much those others contribute to global trade.

The TPP is meaningless if the US is not part of it, as Japanese Prime Minister Shinzo Abe recently admitted-and in so doing, betraying the fact that he wanted to join the game most importantly to fulfill Japan's duty as a US ally, not to seek the further liberalization of world trade.

This being the case, the TPP has naturally failed to convince many it was the "higher level" trade deal it was being touted as. Not least, it has failed to convince Donald Trump, the incoming US president.

Take labor conditions for example. In early development, private companies usually don't have a better record than State-owned enterprises. Yet the latter are categorically discriminated against by the US.

In fact, if rich countries really want to play a useful role in facilitating trade-led development in poorer countries, a more important thing to do is to help the latter develop public infrastructure-from ports and roads to new industrial zones.

This has been the focus of China's endeavors. And, if China and the US could work together, this is where free trade could get a much stronger boost, although so far this has been only wishful thinking.

Most Viewed in 24 Hours
Copyright 1995 - . All rights reserved. The content (including but not limited to text, photo, multimedia information, etc) published in this site belongs to China Daily Information Co (CDIC). Without written authorization from CDIC, such content shall not be republished or used in any form. Note: Browsers with 1024*768 or higher resolution are suggested for this site.
License for publishing multimedia online 0108263

Registration Number: 130349
FOLLOW US
彰武县| 孝昌县| 胶南市| 锡林浩特市| 镇安县| 广东省| 兴城市| 惠水县| 海门市| 尖扎县| 安徽省| 蓬安县| 胶州市| 麻栗坡县| 邵东县| 台南市| 龙海市| 威信县| 常山县| 武宣县| 阿拉尔市| 婺源县| 聂拉木县| 平潭县| 江陵县| 保山市| 且末县| 繁峙县| 扬中市| 高密市| 陆丰市| 昆明市| 日喀则市| 石柱| 姜堰市| 砀山县| 青州市| 郑州市| 佛山市| 古丈县| 新乡市|