国产热热热精品,亚洲视频久久】日韩,三级婷婷在线久久,99人妻精品视频,精品九热人人肉肉在线,AV东京热一区二区,91po在线视频观看,久久激情宗合,青青草黄色手机视频

USEUROPEAFRICAASIA 中文雙語Fran?ais
Opinion
Home / Opinion / Opinion Line

Local govts' subsidies for property purchases serve their own interests

China Daily | Updated: 2016-12-23 07:27

Local govts' subsidies for property purchases serve their own interests

A sales woman introduces a property program to visitors at a spring real estate exhibition held in Beijing, April 17, 2015. [Photo/IC]

THE LOCAL GOVERNMENT OF YU'AN DISTRICT in the city of Lu'an in East China's Anhui province recently posted on its official website information about the house purchase subsidies it had provided, which shows that a person purchased 44 apartments in one single community, accessing subsidies of about 800,000 yuan ($115,456) in all. It is time to reconsider the policies of many local governments to subsidize property purchases, says Beijing News:

A staff member from the real estate market regulatory office responded that the subsidies provided to the person were all legal, because the policy of the local government did not set any ceiling on the number of apartments a person could buy. They just "never expected that one would buy so many".

That exposes a major loophole in the policy of subsidizing people who buy properties, which is quite popular among local governments. As the property markets outside the big cities are stagnant, many local governments have resorted to offering buyers subsidies in order to revitalize their local real estate markets. Yet the case in Lu'an shows how unfair these policies can be.

All the subsidies are public money and come from taxpayers' pockets and they might flow into the hands of the rich, who can afford to buy dozens of apartments, rather than those who struggle to buy one.

Rumor also says that the developer co-worked with the purchaser in order to obtain the subsidy. That might be unfounded, but the danger of such a kind of cheating exists and in case that happens, taxpayers' money goes directly to the hands of realty developers.

Although the top leadership has made it clear that "houses should be for dwelling, not investing", many local governments adopt one policy after another in order to stimulate the realty market. They do so because their interests are deeply interwoven in the real estate industry. They sell land to developers for commercial use, and if the realty market goes down, that might cut a source of income for the local governments. But such policies are unfair because they subsidize the rich largely with the money of the poor.

Most Viewed in 24 Hours
Copyright 1995 - . All rights reserved. The content (including but not limited to text, photo, multimedia information, etc) published in this site belongs to China Daily Information Co (CDIC). Without written authorization from CDIC, such content shall not be republished or used in any form. Note: Browsers with 1024*768 or higher resolution are suggested for this site.
License for publishing multimedia online 0108263

Registration Number: 130349
FOLLOW US
五峰| 酒泉市| 门源| 达日县| 嘉黎县| 独山县| 湄潭县| 綦江县| 临邑县| 阿鲁科尔沁旗| 望江县| 闵行区| 馆陶县| 梁河县| 涡阳县| 和田县| 宿松县| 甘孜县| 图们市| 铜川市| 南陵县| 防城港市| 和龙市| 浏阳市| 白朗县| 东光县| 禹州市| 航空| 苍南县| 永登县| 东城区| 辽中县| 安福县| 保靖县| 山丹县| 海门市| 太康县| 武隆县| 余庆县| 黎平县| 延川县|