国产热热热精品,亚洲视频久久】日韩,三级婷婷在线久久,99人妻精品视频,精品九热人人肉肉在线,AV东京热一区二区,91po在线视频观看,久久激情宗合,青青草黄色手机视频

WORLD> Europe
EU takes different approach to financial crisis
(Xinhua)
Updated: 2009-03-22 09:24


British Prime Minister Gordon Brown (L) and Foreign Secretary David Miliband attend a press conference held after the close of the two-day European Union spring summit in Brussels, capital of Belgium, March 20, 2009. [Xinhua] 

Instead of increasing economic incentives, the EU is clearly more interested in strengthening the international financial supervision and reform of the international financial institutions, in order to better guard against a repeat of the financial crisis.

Related readings:
 EU leaders agree to lend 75 billion euros to IMF
 EU agrees on deal for pipelines, carbon capture
 EU leaders reject more stimulus plan
 EU summit focuses on economic stimulus

On the eve of the EU summit, Merkel and French President Nicolas Sarkozy wrote a letter to the Czech EU presidency and European Commission President Jose Manuel Barros, emphasizing that the EU common position at the London summit should focus on building a new international financial system. Their position has been taken by all EU leaders.

In a long list of the EU common position, the leaders devoted much space to the strengthening of international financial regulation and reform of international financial institutions.

As a general principle, the EU wants supervision and regulation of all sectors and products that may lead to risks in the financial markets -- hedge funds, credit rating agencies, credit derivatives, tax havens, executive pay, corporate capital requirements and accounting standards.

The EU supports reform of the IMF to adapt it to the current global economic pattern. Given the growing weight of emerging economies in the global economy, the EU favors the redistribution of IMF voting rights to give emerging economies more say. The EU leaders also agreed to provide the IMF with 75 billion euros to increase its capacity.

Despite the common position, how far the EU can go in terms of international financial institution reform remains unclear. First of all, a threat comes from the United States. Analysts have pointed out that the United States, by giving emphasis to economic stimulus, was trying to distract the attention of EU on supervision and regulation of international financial institutions.

As the prime source of the financial crisis, the laisser-faire approach of the United States has been under fire. Washington also wants supervision and oversight, but it may not be in complete agreement with the EU as to what extent regulation shall be strengthened.

Secondly, there is doubt about how seriously the EU is considering giving more powers to emerging economies and developing countries in key international financial institutions.

At a G20 finance ministers' and central bankers' meeting on March 14, Brazil, Russia, India and China -- known as "BRIC" countries -- called for immediate measures to expand the four nations' powers in the IMF. There seemed to be disagreements even within the EU's big three -- Britain, France and Germany. Germany and France now also worry that Britain might be leaning toward the United States at the London summit, thus undermining the common EU position.

北安市| 古丈县| 郯城县| 新泰市| 莲花县| 汾阳市| 盐津县| 厦门市| 托里县| 宁乡县| 朔州市| 名山县| 根河市| 蒙山县| 长子县| 溆浦县| 乌拉特前旗| 宜兴市| 定结县| 海城市| 云南省| 大安市| 万宁市| 抚宁县| 高青县| 呈贡县| 四平市| 清丰县| 绥江县| 榆社县| 溧阳市| 鲁山县| 凤冈县| 黄大仙区| 南昌市| 阿坝县| 孟连| 清水河县| 潢川县| 安乡县| 雷州市|