国产热热热精品,亚洲视频久久】日韩,三级婷婷在线久久,99人妻精品视频,精品九热人人肉肉在线,AV东京热一区二区,91po在线视频观看,久久激情宗合,青青草黄色手机视频

Global EditionASIA 中文雙語Fran?ais
Opinion
Home / Opinion / Opinion Line

Residents raise voice against 'overcharging' for parcel lockers

By Wang Yiqing | China Daily | Updated: 2020-05-13 07:30
Share
Share - WeChat
A resident collects her express parcels from a Hive Box self-serve package locker at a residential complex in Beijing on Feb 12. KUANG YANTAO/FOR CHINA DAILY

An open letter from Zhong Huan Garden, a residential community in Shanghai, on Sunday urging Hive Box to adjust its "unreasonable" charging policy for package lockers has gone viral online.

Hive Box, which provides temporary storage of express delivery packages, has invited public criticism in recent days for "overcharging" service users. The company announced recently that beginning in May, it will charge for delivery packages that remain stored in its express lockers for more than 12 hours. The public discontent is not because the company is charging for its services, but because it is overcharging.

Such lockers save an express deliveryman's time, as they can drop parcels into these lockers instead of going all the way to the recipients' doorsteps. Hive Box has been charging deliverymen for this efficient service for some time now. But the consumers, who would prefer the goods to be delivered at their doorstep, are loathe to use the locker service and, worse, even pay for it.

The Provisional Regulations for Express Delivery in China stipulates that recipients have the right to examine and receive their packages in person. The regulation on express locker service, effective since Oct 1, stipulates that deliverymen should seek the recipients' permission before dropping their parcels into the lockers.

Irked by Hive Box's overcharging policy, many resident communities have decided to stop using the service. Dongxinyuan residential community in Hangzhou, Zhejiang province, informed Hive Box about its decision to not use its lockers unless it stops "illegally charging" them. They also sent a copy of their letter to the Hangzhou Consumers Association.

The letter from Zhong Huan Garden owners committee challenges the logic behind Hive Box's overcharging policy, be it from the perspective of consumers' rights, market rules or cost-benefit analysis.

On Tuesday, the committee also appealed to the authorities to launch an investigation against Hive Box for abusing its dominant market position.

The dispute over Hive Box's charges is a perfect example of consumers safeguarding their legal rights through public discussion and legal means. It is now up to the relevant authorities to investigate and safeguard consumers' rights.

Most Viewed in 24 Hours
Top
BACK TO THE TOP
English
Copyright 1994 - . All rights reserved. The content (including but not limited to text, photo, multimedia information, etc) published in this site belongs to China Daily Information Co (CDIC). Without written authorization from CDIC, such content shall not be republished or used in any form. Note: Browsers with 1024*768 or higher resolution are suggested for this site.
License for publishing multimedia online 0108263

Registration Number: 130349
FOLLOW US
宿松县| 湘潭市| 车致| 望奎县| 宁南县| 江达县| 绥德县| 保山市| 涪陵区| 荣昌县| 北票市| 竹北市| 河间市| 平果县| 武邑县| 荃湾区| 永新县| 黑龙江省| 富平县| 天等县| 文成县| 文山县| 大冶市| 景泰县| 乐业县| 宕昌县| 象山县| 岐山县| 辽中县| 南部县| 威宁| 洞头县| 济阳县| 南川市| 临洮县| 大港区| 西峡县| 垫江县| 洛扎县| 阿瓦提县| 广丰县|